Suppr超能文献

一项多中心、双盲、随机、平行组、安慰剂对照、单剂量研究的结果,该研究比较了对乙酰氨基酚、乙酰水杨酸和咖啡因的固定组合与布洛芬用于严重偏头痛患者的急性治疗。

Results of a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, single-dose study comparing the fixed combination of acetaminophen, acetylsalicylic acid, and caffeine with ibuprofen for acute treatment of patients with severe migraine.

作者信息

Goldstein Jerome, Hagen Martina, Gold Morris

机构信息

San Francisco Clinical Research Center, San Francisco, CA, USA

Novartis Consumer Health SA, Switzerland.

出版信息

Cephalalgia. 2014 Nov;34(13):1070-8. doi: 10.1177/0333102414530527. Epub 2014 Apr 14.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, single-dose study (n = 1555), a fixed combination of acetaminophen 500 mg, acetylsalicylic acid 500 mg, and caffeine 130 mg (AAC) was compared with ibuprofen 400 mg (IB) and placebo (PLA) for acute treatment of migraine.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

An exploratory post-hoc analysis compared AAC with IB and PLA in the subset of patients with severe pain at baseline (n = 660).

RESULTS

At most time points, AAC and IB relieved the pain and associated symptoms of severe migraine significantly better than PLA (p ≤ 0.05). AAC was significantly superior to IB for pain relief at 45 minutes and at one, two, three, and four hours postdose (p < 0.04); pain intensity difference from one hour through three hours (p < 0.05); headache response at two hours (p = 0.04); functional disability reduced to little or none at three hours (p = 0.013); freedom from phonophobia at three hours (p = 0.04) and photophobia at 15 minutes postdose (p = 0.03); and use of rescue medication (p = 0.018). AAC patients also reported meaningful pain relief 16 minutes faster than IB patients (132 minutes vs 148 minutes, p = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with severe baseline migraine pain, AAC and IB are significantly more effective than PLA, and AAC provides significantly faster and more effective pain relief than IB.

摘要

引言

在一项多中心、双盲、随机、平行组、安慰剂对照、单剂量研究(n = 1555)中,将对乙酰氨基酚500毫克、乙酰水杨酸500毫克和咖啡因130毫克的固定组合(AAC)与布洛芬400毫克(IB)及安慰剂(PLA)进行比较,用于偏头痛的急性治疗。

受试者与方法

一项探索性事后分析在基线时疼痛严重的患者亚组(n = 660)中比较了AAC与IB及PLA。

结果

在大多数时间点,AAC和IB缓解重度偏头痛的疼痛及相关症状显著优于PLA(p≤0.05)。在给药后45分钟、1小时、2小时、3小时和4小时,AAC在缓解疼痛方面显著优于IB(p < 0.04);1小时至3小时的疼痛强度差异(p < 0.05);2小时时的头痛缓解情况(p = 0.04);3小时时功能障碍减轻至轻微或无功能障碍(p = 0.013);3小时时无恐声症(p = 0.04)及给药后15分钟无畏光症(p = 0.03);以及使用急救药物情况(p = 0.018)。与IB患者相比,AAC患者报告有意义的疼痛缓解快16分钟(132分钟对148分钟,p = 0.026)。

结论

在基线偏头痛疼痛严重的患者中,AAC和IB比PLA显著更有效,且AAC比IB提供显著更快、更有效的疼痛缓解。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验