Tan Gabriel, Nguyen Quang, Cardin Scott A, Jensen Mark P
Chronic Pain Program, Anesthesiology, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
J Pain. 2006 Apr;7(4):252-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2005.11.007.
Previous research has demonstrated that 2-item versions of subscales from the Chronic Pain Coping Inventory, Coping Strategy Questionnaire, and the Survey of Pain Attitudes appear adequately reliable and valid for use in studies with large sample sizes. It was suggested that use of the abbreviated scales might help to expand the testing and application of cognitive-behavioral models of pain to new settings and with new populations where assessment burden might be a key issue. This study explored the utility of these brief scales among veterans in a Veterans Affairs setting. Strong associations were found between the 2-item versions and their respective parent scales. In addition, the 2-item scales were found to be associated with other pain-related measures, supporting their predictive validity. The results of this study replicate previous findings and offer support for the use of the 2-item versions for both screening and research purposes in Veterans Affairs settings with a veteran population.
This article presents the psychometric properties of brief versions of 3 commonly used pain coping and belief questionnaires in a unique population. These measures could be used clinically for initial screening purposes, as well as for treatment monitoring.
先前的研究表明,慢性疼痛应对量表、应对策略问卷和疼痛态度调查中分量表的两项版本,在大样本研究中使用时,似乎具有足够的信度和效度。有人认为,使用简化量表可能有助于将疼痛的认知行为模型的测试和应用扩展到新的环境以及评估负担可能是关键问题的新人群中。本研究探讨了这些简短量表在退伍军人事务部环境中的退伍军人中的效用。发现两项版本与其各自的原量表之间存在强关联。此外,发现两项量表与其他疼痛相关指标相关,支持了它们的预测效度。本研究结果重复了先前的发现,并为在退伍军人事务部环境中对退伍军人人群使用两项版本进行筛查和研究提供了支持。
本文介绍了在一个独特人群中3种常用疼痛应对和信念问卷简短版本的心理测量特性。这些测量方法可用于临床初步筛查以及治疗监测。