• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性疼痛应对量表巴西版的结构效度。

Structural validity of the Chronic Pain Coping Inventory-Brazilian version.

机构信息

College of Nursing, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.

College of Nursing, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Santander, Colombia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Feb 8;16(2):e0246294. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246294. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0246294
PMID:33556089
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7870154/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Chronic Pain Coping Inventory (CPCI) has been widely used to measure coping with pain, however, the psychometric properties of the Brazilian CPCI are unknown.

AIM

To verify the validity and reliability of the CPCI-Brazilian version.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A sample of 705 outpatients with chronic pain participated in the study. Cronbach's alpha, corrected item-total correlations, and confirmatory factor analysis were performed, using the method of Diagonally Weighted Least Squares.

RESULTS

Construct validity was supported with a factor loading range of 0.36-0.90 (9 factors) corroborating original loads. The final model had adequate fit with items 42 and 54 excluded, D.F = 2174, TLI = 0.96; CFI = 0.96 and RMSEA = 0.051(p = 0.067). Eight of the nine CPCI scales showed satisfactory reliability (Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.70 to 0.92). The Relaxation scale obtained a low alpha value (0.53).

CONCLUSION

The CPCI-Brazilian version, after exclusion of items 42 and 54, is valid to measure chronic pain coping in Brazilian adults.

摘要

背景

慢性疼痛应对量表（CPCI）已被广泛用于测量疼痛应对，但巴西版 CPCI 的心理测量特性尚不清楚。

目的

验证巴西版 CPCI 的有效性和可靠性。

材料和方法

本研究纳入了 705 名慢性疼痛门诊患者。采用 Diagonally Weighted Least Squares 方法进行 Cronbach's alpha 分析、校正项目总分相关性分析和验证性因子分析。

结果

构建效度得到支持，因子负荷范围为 0.36-0.90（9 个因素），与原始负荷相符。排除项目 42 和 54 后，最终模型具有较好的拟合度，DF = 2174，TLI = 0.96；CFI = 0.96，RMSEA = 0.051（p = 0.067）。9 个 CPCI 量表中的 8 个具有良好的可靠性（Cronbach's alpha 范围为 0.70-0.92）。放松量表的 alpha 值较低（0.53）。

结论

排除项目 42 和 54 后，巴西版 CPCI 可有效测量巴西成年人的慢性疼痛应对。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa56/7870154/0d50931afe21/pone.0246294.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa56/7870154/9eb680bdeaa6/pone.0246294.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa56/7870154/c994b2375d60/pone.0246294.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa56/7870154/2ab422da2d58/pone.0246294.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa56/7870154/736929cec523/pone.0246294.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa56/7870154/0bd78526748f/pone.0246294.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa56/7870154/c556379a4e50/pone.0246294.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa56/7870154/33cfb743b5d9/pone.0246294.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa56/7870154/3301c3a2104b/pone.0246294.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa56/7870154/0d50931afe21/pone.0246294.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa56/7870154/9eb680bdeaa6/pone.0246294.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa56/7870154/c994b2375d60/pone.0246294.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa56/7870154/2ab422da2d58/pone.0246294.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa56/7870154/736929cec523/pone.0246294.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa56/7870154/0bd78526748f/pone.0246294.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa56/7870154/c556379a4e50/pone.0246294.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa56/7870154/33cfb743b5d9/pone.0246294.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa56/7870154/3301c3a2104b/pone.0246294.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa56/7870154/0d50931afe21/pone.0246294.g009.jpg

相似文献

1
Structural validity of the Chronic Pain Coping Inventory-Brazilian version.慢性疼痛应对量表巴西版的结构效度。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 8;16(2):e0246294. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246294. eCollection 2021.
2
Development of the Italian version of the 42-item Chronic Pain Coping Inventory, CPCI-I: cross-cultural adaptation, factor analysis, reliability and validity.42 项慢性疼痛应对量表（CPCI-I）意大利语版的开发：跨文化调适、因子分析、信度和效度。
Qual Life Res. 2013 Aug;22(6):1459-65. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0271-y. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
3
Cross-cultural adaptation and clinimetric property of Korean version of the Chronic Pain Coping Inventory-42 in patients with chronic low back pain.慢性下腰痛患者中韩文版慢性疼痛应对量表-42的跨文化适应性及测量学特性
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Mar 15;35(6):666-71. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ba7a78.
4
The Chronic Pain Coping Inventory: confirmatory factor analysis of the French version.慢性疼痛应对量表：法语版的验证性因素分析
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006 Feb 14;7:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-13.
5
Psychometric properties of the Polish language version of the chronic pain coping inventory-42 for patients treated surgically due to herniated lumbar discs and spondylotic changes.针对因腰椎间盘突出症和脊柱关节病改变而接受手术治疗的患者，慢性疼痛应对量表 - 42波兰语版本的心理测量学特性。
Med Sci Monit. 2014 May 14;20:789-801. doi: 10.12659/MSM.889728.
6
The 27-item coping strategies questionnaire-revised: confirmatory factor analysis, reliability and validity in Italian-speaking subjects with chronic pain.27项应对策略问卷修订版：意大利语慢性疼痛患者的验证性因素分析、信度和效度
Pain Res Manag. 2014 May-Jun;19(3):153-8. doi: 10.1155/2014/956828. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
7
Confirmatory Factor Analysis, Reliability, and Validity of the Persian Version of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire for Iranian People With Nonspecific Chronic Neck Pain.伊朗非特异性慢性颈痛人群应对策略问卷波斯文版的验证性因子分析、信度和效度。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2021 Jan;44(1):72-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2020.08.004. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
8
Preliminary psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Chronic Pain Coping Inventory (ChCPCI) in a Hong Kong Chinese population.中文版慢性疼痛应对量表（ChCPCI）在香港中文人群中的初步心理测量特性。
J Pain. 2010 Jul;11(7):672-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.10.008. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
9
Validation of the Chronic Pain Coping Inventory.慢性疼痛应对量表的验证
Pain. 1999 Apr;80(3):471-481. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(98)00224-3.
10
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and construct validity of the Tampa scale for kinesiophobia for temporomandibular disorders (TSK/TMD-Br) into Brazilian Portuguese.跨文化调适、特鲁姆普关节痛恐惧量表（TSK/TMD-Br）用于评估颞下颌关节紊乱病的可靠性和结构效度的巴西葡萄牙语版本。
J Oral Rehabil. 2017 Jul;44(7):500-510. doi: 10.1111/joor.12515. Epub 2017 May 15.

本文引用的文献

1
The effectiveness of hypnosis for pain relief: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 85 controlled experimental trials.催眠缓解疼痛的效果：85 项对照实验研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Apr;99:298-310. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.02.013. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
2
Cognitive behavioural therapy and pain coping skills training for osteoarthritis knee pain management: a systematic review.用于骨关节炎膝关节疼痛管理的认知行为疗法和疼痛应对技能训练：一项系统综述
J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Dec;29(12):2228-2235. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.2228. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
3
Evaluating psychosocial contributions to chronic pain outcomes.
评估心理社会因素对慢性疼痛结局的影响。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2018 Dec 20;87(Pt B):168-182. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.01.017. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
4
Hypnosis for reduction of background pain and pain anxiety in men with burns: A blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled study.催眠对减轻男性烧伤患者的背景疼痛和疼痛焦虑的作用：一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照研究。
Burns. 2018 Feb;44(1):108-117. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
5
Assessment of Psychosocial and Functional Impact of Chronic Pain.慢性疼痛的心理社会和功能影响评估
J Pain. 2016 Sep;17(9 Suppl):T21-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2016.02.006.
6
Pain coping skills training for African Americans with osteoarthritis (STAART): study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.针对骨关节炎非裔美国人的疼痛应对技能培训（STAART）：一项随机对照试验的研究方案
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Aug 23;17(1):359. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1217-2.
7
The Relationship between Pain Beliefs and Physical and Mental Health Outcome Measures in Chronic Low Back Pain: Direct and Indirect Effects.慢性下腰痛患者疼痛信念与身心健康结局指标之间的关系：直接和间接影响
Healthcare (Basel). 2016 Aug 19;4(3):58. doi: 10.3390/healthcare4030058.
8
Coping Styles, Pain Expressiveness, and Implicit Theories of Chronic Pain.应对方式、疼痛表达及慢性疼痛的内隐理论
J Psychol. 2015;149(7):737-50. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2014.977759. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
9
Prediction of Quality of life by Self-Efficacy, Pain Intensity and Pain Duration in Patient with Pain Disorders.自我效能感、疼痛强度和疼痛持续时间对疼痛障碍患者生活质量的预测
Basic Clin Neurosci. 2013 Spring;4(2):117-24.
10
Nurse practitioners can effectively deliver pain coping skills training to osteoarthritis patients with chronic pain: A randomized, controlled trial.执业护士可为患有慢性疼痛的骨关节炎患者有效提供疼痛应对技能培训：一项随机对照试验。
Pain. 2014 Sep;155(9):1743-1754. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.05.024. Epub 2014 May 24.