Verin Eric, Marie Jean-Paul, Tardif Catherine, Denis Philippe
Service de Physiologie digestive, urinaire, respiratoire et sportive, CHU de ROUEN-1 rue de Germont, 76031 ROUEN Cedex, France.
Respir Med. 2006 Nov;100(11):1944-51. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2006.03.005. Epub 2006 Apr 18.
The aim of the present study was to evaluate diaphragmatic strength in patients with unilateral diaphragmatic paralysis and to determine whether patients with recent diaphragm paralysis develop lower inspiratory pressure than patients with longstanding diaphragmatic paralysis. Twenty patients (16 men and 4 women, 62+/-12 years) and six control subjects were included (4 men and 2 women, 53+/-15 years) in the study. Esophageal pressure during sharp sniff (Pes,sniff), bilateral cervical phrenic nerve magnetic stimulation (Pes,cms) and unilateral phrenic nerve stimulation (Pes,ums) (in nine patients) were measured. Sixteen patients presented right diaphragmatic paralysis and four, left diaphragmatic paralysis. Pes,sniff was higher in control subjects than in patients with diaphragmatic paralysis (respectively 110+/-22 cmH2O and 82+/-24 cmH2O, P<0.05). There was no difference in Pes,cms between patients with diaphragmatic paralysis and control subjects (14+/-7 cmH2O vs. 16+/-4 cmH2O; ns). Pes,ums after stimulation of the affected phrenic nerve was less than 4 cmH2O, was 8+/-2 cmH2O after stimulation of the intact phrenic nerve and was correlated to Pes,cms (R=0.87, P<0.01). There was a positive correlation between Pes,cms, Pes,ums of the intact hemidiaphragm, Pes,sniff and the time from the onset of symptoms and the diaphragmatic explorations (respectively R=0.86, P<0.0001; R=0.72, P<0.05; R=0.48, P<0.05). In conclusion, diaphragmatic strength after unilateral diaphragmatic paralysis seems to improve with time.
本研究的目的是评估单侧膈肌麻痹患者的膈肌力量,并确定近期发生膈肌麻痹的患者吸气压力是否低于长期存在膈肌麻痹的患者。本研究纳入了20例患者(16例男性和4例女性,年龄62±12岁)和6例对照者(4例男性和2例女性,年龄53±15岁)。测量了深吸气时的食管压力(Pes,sniff)、双侧颈膈神经磁刺激时的食管压力(Pes,cms)以及单侧膈神经刺激时的食管压力(Pes,ums)(9例患者)。16例患者表现为右侧膈肌麻痹,4例为左侧膈肌麻痹。对照者的Pes,sniff高于膈肌麻痹患者(分别为110±22 cmH2O和82±24 cmH2O,P<0.05)。膈肌麻痹患者与对照者的Pes,cms无差异(14±7 cmH2O对16±4 cmH2O;无统计学意义)。刺激患侧膈神经后的Pes,ums小于4 cmH2O,刺激健侧膈神经后的Pes,ums为8±2 cmH2O,且与Pes,cms相关(R=0.87,P<0.01)。Pes,cms、健侧半膈肌的Pes,ums、Pes,sniff与症状出现至膈肌检查的时间之间呈正相关(分别为R=0.86,P<0.0001;R=0.72,P<0.05;R=0.48,P<0.05)。总之,单侧膈肌麻痹后的膈肌力量似乎随时间而改善。