Prigent Hélène, Orlikowski David, Fermanian Christophe, Lejaille Michèle, Falaize Line, Louis Alain, Fauroux Brigitte, Lofaso Frédéric
Service de Physiologie-Explorations Fonctionnelles, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, AP-HP, 92380 Garches, France.
Respir Med. 2008 Dec;102(12):1737-43. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2008.07.004. Epub 2008 Aug 16.
We hypothesized that peak values of oesophageal (Poes) and transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi) swings during a maximal sniff manoeuvre and a maximal static inspiratory manoeuvre (Muller manoeuvre) are comparable or give complementary information for assessing diaphragmatic and global inspiratory muscle strength. We studied 98 patients with suspected diaphragmatic dysfunction. Poes and Pdi swings were measured during maximal sniff manoeuvres (sniff), maximal Muller manoeuvres (max), and cervical magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation (cervical Tw). Eighty eight patients were able to perform both volitional manoeuvres. Among them, mean Poes sniff was significantly higher than mean Poes max (48.7+/-28.7 cm H(2)O vs. 42.9+/-27.4 cm H(2)O, p<0.05) and mean Pdi sniff was higher than mean Pdi max (49.2+/-35.1cm H(2)O vs. 42.9+/-33.3 cm H(2)O, respectively, p=0.05). Cervical Pdi Tw correlated better with Pdi sniff (p<0.0001, r=0.62) than with Pdi max (p<0.0001, r=0.44). Poes and Pdi swings were greatest during the sniff manoeuvre in 42 patients (48%) and during the Muller manoeuvre in 29 patients (33%). Among the 17 remaining patients, nine had the greatest Poes swing during a maximal sniff manoeuvre and the greatest Pdi swing during a maximal static inspiratory manoeuvre; the opposite occurred in the other eight patients. The combination of Muller manoeuvre and sniff manoeuvre increased the diagnosis of normal diaphragmatic strength from 18 patients (20%) to 21 patients (24%), and the additional analysis of cervical Pdi Tw further increased the diagnosis of normal diaphragmatic strength to 27 patients (31%). In conclusion, though sniff manoeuvre gave significantly higher values than Muller manoeuvre, both volitional manoeuvres and cervical Pdi Tw are complementary and should be used in combination to evaluate diaphragmatic muscle strength.
我们假设,在最大吸气动作和最大静态吸气动作(米勒动作)期间,食管压力(Poes)和跨膈压(Pdi)波动的峰值具有可比性,或者能为评估膈肌和整体吸气肌力量提供互补信息。我们研究了98例疑似膈肌功能障碍的患者。在最大吸气动作(吸气)、最大米勒动作(最大)和颈部膈神经磁刺激(颈部Tw)期间测量Poes和Pdi波动。88例患者能够完成这两种自主动作。其中,平均Poes吸气显著高于平均Poes最大动作(48.7±28.7 cm H₂O对42.9±27.4 cm H₂O,p<0.05),平均Pdi吸气高于平均Pdi最大动作(分别为49.2±35.1cm H₂O对42.9±33.3 cm H₂O,p=0.05)。颈部Pdi Tw与Pdi吸气的相关性(p<0.0001,r=0.62)优于与Pdi最大动作的相关性(p<0.0001,r=0.44)。42例患者(48%)在吸气动作期间Poes和Pdi波动最大,29例患者(33%)在米勒动作期间最大。在其余17例患者中,9例在最大吸气动作期间Poes波动最大,在最大静态吸气动作期间Pdi波动最大;另外8例患者情况相反。米勒动作和吸气动作相结合,使正常膈肌力量的诊断从18例患者(20%)增加到21例患者(24%),对颈部Pdi Tw的额外分析进一步将正常膈肌力量的诊断增加到27例患者(31%)。总之,尽管吸气动作的值显著高于米勒动作,但两种自主动作和颈部Pdi Tw具有互补性,应联合使用以评估膈肌力量。