Yang Shu-Chang, Kuo Pei-Wen, Wang Jung-Der, Lin Ming-I, Su Syi
Institute of Health Care Organization Administration, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
J Formos Med Assoc. 2006 Apr;105(4):299-309. doi: 10.1016/s0929-6646(09)60121-2.
Quality of life (QOL) is now considered to be an important part of the assessment of dialysis patients. The aim of this study was to develop and assess the reliability, validity and sensitivity of the dialysis module of the World Health Organization Quality of Life - Brief (WHOQOL-BREF) Taiwan version [WHOQOL-BREF(TW)] in patients undergoing regular hemodialysis (HD).
QOL survey was administered to 283 regular HD patients in metropolitan Taipei. The instruments used included: (1) the proposed module - composed of the core part, the WHOQOL-BREF(TW), and the six specific items; (2) the symptom/problem (S/P) scale - composed of 12 items specific for dialysis patients; (3) the utility measure, which was performed with standard gamble (SG) methods; and (4) the rating scale (RS).
Based on the six criteria of validity, reliability and variance of the items, four HD-specific items were selected. Reliability study showed that Cronbach's alphas, composite reliability, and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation at an average retest interval of 4-8 weeks) of the four domains of physical, psychological, social relationship and environment, ranged from 0.74-0.82, 0.79-0.84 and 0.61-0.79, respectively. Validity study showed that all the correlations between an item and its corresponding domain were highly significant (r>0.4, p<0.01) and larger than the correlations between the item and other domains. SG and psychometric measures showed relatively low correlations (0.12-0.26). The module showed the same construct as the WHOQOL-BREF(TW) under confirmatory factor analysis, whereas the exploratory factor analysis showed mild variation. Convergent and discriminant validity were good. Global QOL, physical, psychological and environment domains had some sensitivity to differentiate the severity of the condition of patients receiving HD. Clinical validity was demonstrated in global QOL, physical and psychological domains to have significant correlations with S/P scores.
Besides broader coverage than the core WHOQOL-BREF(TW), the dialysis module of the WHOQOL-BREF(TW) is a valid, reliable and sensitive QOL instrument for the assessment of HD patients in Taiwan.
生活质量(QOL)如今被视为透析患者评估的重要组成部分。本研究的目的是开发并评估世界卫生组织生活质量简表(WHOQOL - BREF)台湾版[WHOQOL - BREF(TW)]的透析模块在接受定期血液透析(HD)患者中的信度、效度和敏感性。
对台北都会区的283例定期HD患者进行了QOL调查。使用的工具包括:(1)提议的模块——由核心部分、WHOQOL - BREF(TW)和六个特定项目组成;(2)症状/问题(S/P)量表——由12个针对透析患者的特定项目组成;(3)效用测量,采用标准博弈(SG)方法进行;(4)评定量表(RS)。
基于项目的效度、信度和方差的六个标准,选择了四个HD特定项目。信度研究表明,身体、心理、社会关系和环境四个领域的克朗巴哈α系数、组合信度和重测信度(平均重测间隔为4 - 8周时的组内相关系数)分别为0.74 - 0.82、0.79 - 0.84和0.61 - 0.79。效度研究表明,一个项目与其相应领域之间的所有相关性都非常显著(r>0.4,p<0.01),且大于该项目与其他领域之间的相关性。SG和心理测量指标显示出相对较低的相关性(0.12 - 0.26)。在验证性因素分析下,该模块与WHOQOL - BREF(TW)具有相同的结构,而探索性因素分析显示出轻微差异。聚合效度和区分效度良好。总体生活质量、身体、心理和环境领域在区分接受HD治疗患者病情严重程度方面具有一定敏感性。在总体生活质量、身体和心理领域的临床效度表现为与S/P评分具有显著相关性。
除了比WHOQOL - BREF(TW)核心部分覆盖范围更广外,WHOQOL - BREF(TW)的透析模块是一种用于评估台湾HD患者的有效、可靠且敏感的QOL工具。