Rekate Harold L, Nadkarni Trimurti, Wallace Donna
Division of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona 85013-4496, USA.
J Neurosurg. 2006 Apr;104(4 Suppl):240-4. doi: 10.3171/ped.2006.104.4.240.
Severely increased intracranial pressure (ICP) can be life threatening in patients who had previously undergone shunt treatment but who do not experience ventricular enlargement. The authors analyzed the utility of placing shunts into the cisterna magna concurrently with ventricular shunts in patients who were not candidates for lumboperitoneal (LP) shunt placement.
Ten patients treated with cisterna magna-ventricle-peritoneum (CMVP) shunts for complex problems of shunt function were reviewed retrospectively. All patients had documented increases in ICP and ventricles that did not expand despite life-threatening increases (> 80 mm Hg in one case) in ICP. Between 1995 and 2003, 10 patients (four males and six females, age range 4-32 years) were identified as having life-threatening increases in ICP despite small or slit-like ventricles on imaging studies. Each episode was documented with intraparenchymal pressure monitoring. All patients had documented ventricular catheter failures at the time of the intervention, and all had undergone at least one previous attempt to treat the condition with a valve upgrade and replacement of the ventricular catheter. Three patients had achondroplasia, four had spina bifida, and three had a preexisting Chiari malformation Type I. All patients improved after the procedure, and none suffered permanent complications. For at least 48 hours after surgery, all patients underwent intraparenchymal monitoring of ICP (an intraparenchymal monitor was used that documented normal ICP).
The CMVP shunts are an excellent option for patients who are not candidates for LP shunts but who have high ICP and ventricles that do not enlarge at shunt failure. The ability to access the spinal fluid in the cortical subarachnoid space presumably accounts for this success.
对于既往接受过分流治疗但脑室未增大的患者,严重升高的颅内压(ICP)可能危及生命。作者分析了在不适合行腰大池 - 腹腔(LP)分流术的患者中,同时将分流管置入枕大池与脑室分流术的实用性。
回顾性分析10例因分流功能复杂问题接受枕大池 - 脑室 - 腹腔(CMVP)分流术治疗的患者。所有患者均记录有ICP升高,且尽管ICP升高至危及生命的水平(1例>80 mmHg),脑室并未扩大。1995年至2003年期间,10例患者(4例男性,6例女性,年龄范围4 - 32岁)经影像学检查发现尽管脑室小或呈裂隙状,但ICP升高危及生命。每次发作均通过脑实质内压力监测记录。所有患者在干预时均记录有脑室导管功能障碍,且均至少曾尝试过一次通过升级瓣膜和更换脑室导管来治疗该病症。3例患者患有软骨发育不全,4例患有脊柱裂,3例患有先天性I型Chiari畸形。所有患者术后均有改善,无一例出现永久性并发症。术后至少48小时,所有患者均接受脑实质内ICP监测(使用记录正常ICP的脑实质内监测仪)。
对于不适合行LP分流术但ICP高且分流失败时脑室不扩大的患者,CMVP分流术是一个极佳的选择。能够进入皮质蛛网膜下腔获取脑脊液可能是取得这一成功的原因。