Suppr超能文献

鼻窦结局评分系统综述——哪一种最佳?

A review of sinonasal outcome scoring systems - which is best?

作者信息

Morley A D, Sharp H R

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Kent and Canterbury Hospital, UK.

出版信息

Clin Otolaryngol. 2006 Apr;31(2):103-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2006.01155.x.

Abstract
  • In patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis, there is a lack of a universally accepted system for the evaluation of outcome. * This makes critical comparison between results less meaningful. * To determine the most suitable sinonasal outcome scoring system for use in our own practice, we reviewed the available literature and known systems in existence. * We analysed 15 known disease-specific sinonasal outcome indices with emphasis on reliability, validity and responsiveness. * We concluded by choosing one quality of life outcome tool for our departmental use, the Sinonasal Outcome Test-22, due to its reliability, validity, responsiveness and ease of use. * It has been validated to distinguish between disease-affected patient groups and those without rhinosinusitis, demonstrate a worse score if the condition gets worse and show an appropriateness of items and scales in the questionnaire. This has been demonstrated in 3128 British patients.
摘要
  • 在接受慢性鼻-鼻窦炎内镜鼻窦手术的患者中,缺乏一种普遍接受的结果评估系统。

  • 这使得结果之间的关键比较意义不大。

  • 为了确定在我们自己的实践中最适合使用的鼻窦结局评分系统,我们回顾了现有的文献和已知的系统。

  • 我们分析了15种已知的特定疾病鼻窦结局指标,重点关注可靠性、有效性和反应性。

  • 我们最终选择了一种生活质量结局工具——鼻窦结局测试-22(Sinonasal Outcome Test-22)供科室使用,因为它具有可靠性、有效性、反应性且易于使用。

  • 它已经过验证,能够区分患病患者组和无鼻-鼻窦炎患者组,病情恶化时得分会更差,并且问卷中的项目和量表具有适当性。这在3128名英国患者中得到了证实。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验