Conde-Agudelo Agustin, Rosas-Bermúdez Anyeli, Kafury-Goeta Ana Cecilia
Centro de Estudios e Investigación en Salud and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia.
JAMA. 2006 Apr 19;295(15):1809-23. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.15.1809.
Both short and long interpregnancy intervals have been associated with an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. However, whether this possible association is confounded by maternal characteristics or socioeconomic status is uncertain.
To examine the association between birth spacing and relative risk of adverse perinatal outcomes.
Studies published in any language were retrieved by searching MEDLINE (1966 through January 2006), EMBASE, ECLA, POPLINE, CINAHL, and LILACS, proceedings of meetings on birth spacing, and bibliographies of retrieved articles, and by contact with relevant researchers in the field.
Included studies were cohort, cross-sectional, and case-control studies with results adjusted for at least maternal age and socioeconomic status, reporting risk estimates and 95% confidence intervals (or data to calculate them) of birth spacing and perinatal outcomes. Of 130 articles identified in the search, 67 (52%) were included.
Information on study design, participant characteristics, measure of birth spacing used, measures of outcome, control for potential confounding factors, and risk estimates was abstracted independently by 2 investigators using a standardized protocol.
A random-effects model and meta-regression analyses were used to pool data from individual studies. Compared with interpregnancy intervals of 18 to 23 months, interpregnancy intervals shorter than 6 months were associated with increased risks of preterm birth, low birth weight, and small for gestational age (pooled adjusted odds ratios [95% confidence intervals]: 1.40 [1.24-1.58], 1.61 [1.39-1.86], and 1.26 [1.18-1.33], respectively). Intervals of 6 to 17 months and longer than 59 months were also associated with a significantly greater risk for the 3 adverse perinatal outcomes.
Interpregnancy intervals shorter than 18 months and longer than 59 months are significantly associated with increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. These data suggest that spacing pregnancies appropriately could help prevent such adverse perinatal outcomes.
妊娠间隔过短和过长均与围产期不良结局风险增加相关。然而,这种可能的关联是否会受到母亲特征或社会经济地位的影响尚不确定。
研究生育间隔与围产期不良结局相对风险之间的关联。
通过检索MEDLINE(1966年至2006年1月)、EMBASE、ECLA、POPLINE、CINAHL和LILACS、生育间隔会议论文集以及检索文章的参考文献,并与该领域的相关研究人员联系,获取以任何语言发表的研究。
纳入的研究包括队列研究、横断面研究和病例对照研究,其结果至少根据母亲年龄和社会经济地位进行了调整,报告了生育间隔和围产期结局的风险估计值及95%置信区间(或可计算这些值的数据)。在检索到的130篇文章中,67篇(52%)被纳入。
两名研究人员使用标准化方案独立提取有关研究设计、参与者特征、所使用的生育间隔测量方法、结局测量方法、对潜在混杂因素的控制以及风险估计值的信息。
采用随机效应模型和meta回归分析对各研究的数据进行汇总。与妊娠间隔18至23个月相比,妊娠间隔短于6个月与早产、低出生体重和小于胎龄儿风险增加相关(合并调整比值比[95%置信区间]分别为:1.40[1.24 - 1.58]、1.61[1.39 - 1.86]和1.26[1.18 - 1.33])。6至17个月以及超过59个月的间隔也与这3种围产期不良结局的显著更高风险相关。
妊娠间隔短于18个月和超过59个月与围产期不良结局风险增加显著相关。这些数据表明,适当安排妊娠间隔有助于预防此类围产期不良结局。