Suppr超能文献

跨文化研究中的隐私问题:对斯里兰卡一项人种志研究的思考

The problem of privacy in transcultural research: reflections on an ethnographic study in Sri Lanka.

作者信息

Monshi Bardia, Zieglmayer Verena

机构信息

Hietzinger Hauptstrasse 115/7, 1130 Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Ethics Behav. 2004;14(4):305-12. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb1404_2.

Abstract

Western laws and codes of ethics frequently require that private health information be treated confidentially. However, cross-cultural research shows that it is not always easy to determine what members of a culture consider to be private or how they wish private information to be handled. This article begins by presenting an ethnographic study of patient-healer relationships in Sri Lanka; researchers were surprised to find that participants' views of health and privacy differed greatly from typical Western views, and that the privacy protections they had put in place caused discomfort among participants. Building on this ethics case study, the article explores two main questions. First, can a single definition of privacy possibly do justice to the cultural variations that exist, or does a conceptual definition inevitably run the risk of ethnocentrism? Second, to what extent is strict compliance with research regulations or ethics codes ethically justifiable when following the rules will obviously cause unease in international participants?

摘要

西方法律和道德准则常常要求对私人健康信息予以保密。然而,跨文化研究表明,要确定一种文化中的成员认为什么是私密的,或者他们希望如何处理私密信息,并非总是易事。本文开篇介绍了一项对斯里兰卡医患关系的人种志研究;研究人员惊讶地发现,参与者对健康和隐私的看法与典型的西方观点大相径庭,而且他们所实施的隐私保护措施在参与者中引起了不适。基于这个伦理案例研究,本文探讨了两个主要问题。其一,对于存在的文化差异,隐私的单一定义是否有可能做到公平公正,或者概念性定义是否不可避免地存在民族中心主义的风险?其二,当严格遵守研究规定或道德准则显然会在国际参与者中引起不安时,在何种程度上这种严格遵守在伦理上是合理的?

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验