DuBois James M
Center for Health Care Ethics, Saint Louis University, Salus Center, 221 N. Grand Blvd., St. Louis, MO 63103-2006, USA.
Ethics Behav. 2004;14(4):313-9. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb1404_3.
Monshi and Zieglmayer's case study presents Sri Lankan participants as having views on the privacy of health information that differ radically from those commonly found in Western nations. This article explores 2 questions that their case study raises for the ethical review of research in international settings: First, are allegedly universal ethical principles--of the sort promulgated in the Belmont Report (National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, 1978)--useful in international settings?, and second, how should research oversight bodies address the challenges that arise in international behavioral and social science research?
蒙希和齐格迈尔的案例研究表明,斯里兰卡参与者对健康信息隐私的看法与西方国家常见的看法截然不同。本文探讨了他们的案例研究在国际环境下的研究伦理审查方面提出的两个问题:第一,像《贝尔蒙报告》(生物医学和行为研究人类受试者保护国家委员会,1978年)中所颁布的那种所谓普遍的伦理原则,在国际环境中是否有用?第二,研究监督机构应如何应对国际行为和社会科学研究中出现的挑战?