Mulkidjanian Armen Y, Heberle Joachim, Cherepanov Dmitry A
AN Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006 Aug;1757(8):913-30. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2006.02.015. Epub 2006 Mar 24.
The review focuses on the anisotropy of proton transfer at the surface of biological membranes. We consider (i) the data from "pulsed" experiments, where light-triggered enzymes capture or eject protons at the membrane surface, (ii) the electrostatic properties of water at charged interfaces, and (iii) the specific structural attributes of proton-translocating enzymes. The pulsed experiments revealed that proton exchange between the membrane surface and the bulk aqueous phase takes as much as about 1 ms, but could be accelerated by added mobile pH-buffers. Since the accelerating capacity of the latter decreased with the increase in their electric charge, it was concluded that the membrane surface is separated from the bulk aqueous phase by a barrier of electrostatic nature. The barrier could arise owing to the water polarization at the negatively charged membrane surface. The barrier height depends linearly on the charge of penetrating ions; for protons, it has been estimated as about 0.12 eV. While the proton exchange between the surface and the bulk aqueous phase is retarded by the interfacial barrier, the proton diffusion along the membrane, between neighboring enzymes, takes only microseconds. The proton spreading over the membrane is facilitated by the hydrogen-bonded networks at the surface. The membrane-buried layers of these networks can eventually serve as a storage/buffer for protons (proton sponges). As the proton equilibration between the surface and the bulk aqueous phase is slower than the lateral proton diffusion between the "sources" and "sinks", the proton activity at the membrane surface, as sensed by the energy transducing enzymes at steady state, might deviate from that measured in the adjoining water phase. This trait should increase the driving force for ATP synthesis, especially in the case of alkaliphilic bacteria.
本综述聚焦于生物膜表面质子转移的各向异性。我们考虑了:(i)“脉冲”实验的数据,其中光触发酶在膜表面捕获或释放质子;(ii)带电界面处水的静电性质;(iii)质子转运酶的特定结构属性。脉冲实验表明,膜表面与本体水相之间的质子交换耗时约1毫秒,但添加可移动的pH缓冲剂可加速这一过程。由于后者的加速能力随其电荷增加而降低,因此得出结论,膜表面与本体水相之间存在静电性质的屏障。该屏障可能是由于带负电的膜表面处水的极化而产生的。屏障高度与穿透离子的电荷呈线性关系;对于质子,估计约为0.12电子伏特。虽然表面与本体水相之间的质子交换受到界面屏障的阻碍,但质子在膜上相邻酶之间的扩散仅需微秒。膜表面的氢键网络促进了质子在膜上的扩散。这些网络的膜埋层最终可作为质子的储存/缓冲器(质子海绵)。由于表面与本体水相之间的质子平衡比“源”与“汇”之间的横向质子扩散慢,在稳态下,能量转换酶所感知的膜表面质子活性可能与相邻水相中测得的不同。这一特性应会增加ATP合成的驱动力,尤其是在嗜碱细菌的情况下。