Suppr超能文献

六个欧洲国家的“不要复苏”决定。

Do-not-resuscitate decisions in six European countries.

作者信息

van Delden Johannes J M, Löfmark Rurik, Deliens Luc, Bosshard Georg, Norup Michael, Cecioni Riccardo, van der Heide Agnes

机构信息

University Medical Center Utrecht, Julius Center for Health Sciences, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2006 Jun;34(6):1686-90. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000218417.51292.A7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study and compare the incidence and main background characteristics of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) decision making in six European countries.

DESIGN

Retrospective.

SETTING

We studied DNR decisions simultaneously in Belgium (Flanders), Denmark, Italy (four regions), the Netherlands, Sweden, and Switzerland (German-speaking part). In each country, random samples of death certificates were drawn from death registries to which all deaths are reported. The deaths occurred between June 2001 and February 2002.

PARTICIPANTS

Reporting physicians received a mailed questionnaire about the medical decision making that had preceded death. The response percentage was 75% for the Netherlands, 67% for Switzerland, 62% for Denmark, 61% for Sweden, 59% for Belgium, and 44% for Italy. The total number of deaths studied was 20,480.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Measurements were frequency of DNR decisions, both individual and institutional, and patient involvement. Before death, an individual DNR decision was made in about 50-60% of all nonsudden deaths (Switzerland 73%, Italy 16%). The frequency of institutional decisions was highest in Sweden (22%) and Italy (17%) and lowest in Belgium (5%). DNR decisions are discussed with competent patients in 10-84% of cases. In the Netherlands patient involvement rose from 53% in 1990 to 84% in 2001. In case of incompetent patients, physicians bypassed relatives in 5-37% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Except in Italy, DNR decisions are a common phenomenon in these six countries. Most of these decisions are individual, but institutional decisions occur frequently as well. In most countries, the involvement of patients in DNR decision making can be improved.

摘要

目的

研究并比较六个欧洲国家中放弃心肺复苏(DNR)决策的发生率及主要背景特征。

设计

回顾性研究。

背景

我们同时对比利时(弗拉芒地区)、丹麦、意大利(四个地区)、荷兰、瑞典和瑞士(德语区)的DNR决策进行研究。在每个国家,从死亡登记处抽取死亡证明的随机样本,所有死亡均会上报至该登记处。死亡事件发生在2001年6月至2002年2月期间。

参与者

上报医生收到一份关于死亡前医疗决策的邮寄问卷。荷兰的回复率为75%,瑞士为67%,丹麦为62%,瑞典为61%,比利时为59%,意大利为44%。研究的死亡总数为20480例。

干预措施

无。

测量指标及主要结果

测量指标为个体及机构层面DNR决策的频率以及患者的参与情况。在所有非猝死病例中,约50%-60%在死亡前做出了个体DNR决策(瑞士为73%,意大利为16%)。机构决策频率在瑞典最高(22%)和意大利(17%),在比利时最低(5%)。在10%-84%的病例中与有行为能力的患者讨论了DNR决策。在荷兰,患者的参与率从1990年的53%上升至2001年的84%。对于无行为能力的患者,医生在5%-37%的病例中未通知其亲属。

结论

除意大利外,DNR决策在这六个国家是一种常见现象。这些决策大多是个体做出的,但机构决策也很常见。在大多数国家,患者在DNR决策中的参与情况还有待改善。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验