Suppr超能文献

欧洲六个国家中临近死亡患者放弃人工营养或水合作用的情况。

Forgoing artificial nutrition or hydration in patients nearing death in six European countries.

作者信息

Buiting Hilde M, van Delden Johannes J M, Rietjens Judith A C, Onwuteaka-Philipsen Bregje D, Bilsen Johan, Fischer Susanne, Löfmark Rurik, Miccinesi Guido, Norup Michael, van der Heide Agnes

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007 Sep;34(3):305-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.12.006. Epub 2007 Jul 2.

Abstract

Whether or not artificial nutrition or hydration (ANH) may be forgone in terminally ill patients has been the subject of medical and ethical discussions. Information about the frequency and background characteristics of making decisions to forgo ANH is generally limited to specific clinical settings. The aim of this study was to compare the practice of forgoing ANH in six European countries: Belgium, Denmark, Italy, The Netherlands, Sweden, and Switzerland. In each country, random samples were drawn from death registries. Subsequently, the reporting physician received a questionnaire about the medical decisions that preceded the patient's death. The total number of deaths studied was 20,480. The percentage of all deaths that were preceded by a decision to forgo ANH varied from 2.6% in Italy to 10.9% in The Netherlands. In most countries, decisions to forgo ANH were more frequently made for female patients, patients aged 80 years or older, and for patients who died of a malignancy or disease of the nervous system (including dementia). Of patients in whom ANH was forgone, 67%-93% were incompetent. Patients in whom ANH was forgone did not receive more potentially life-shortening drugs to relieve symptoms than other patients for whom other end-of-life decisions had been made. Decisions to forgo ANH are made in a substantial percentage of terminally ill patients. Providing all patients who are in the terminal stage of a lethal disease with ANH does not seem to be a widely accepted standard among physicians in Western Europe.

摘要

对于晚期患者是否可以放弃人工营养和水分补充(ANH)一直是医学和伦理讨论的主题。关于做出放弃ANH决定的频率和背景特征的信息通常仅限于特定的临床环境。本研究的目的是比较比利时、丹麦、意大利、荷兰、瑞典和瑞士这六个欧洲国家放弃ANH的情况。在每个国家,从死亡登记处抽取随机样本。随后,报告医生收到一份关于患者死亡前医疗决策的问卷。研究的死亡总数为20480例。所有死亡中在做出放弃ANH决定之前的比例从意大利的2.6%到荷兰的10.9%不等。在大多数国家,放弃ANH的决定在女性患者、80岁及以上的患者以及死于恶性肿瘤或神经系统疾病(包括痴呆症)的患者中更为常见。在放弃ANH的患者中,67%-93%无行为能力。放弃ANH的患者与做出其他临终决定的其他患者相比,并未接受更多可能缩短生命以缓解症状的药物。相当比例的晚期患者会做出放弃ANH的决定。在西欧医生中,为所有处于致命疾病末期的患者提供ANH似乎并不是一个被广泛接受的标准。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验