Suppr超能文献

评估绿激光选择性前列腺汽化术治疗高危良性前列腺增生患者的疗效。

Evaluation of greenlight photoselective vaporization of the prostate for the treatment of high-risk patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

作者信息

Fu Wei-Jun, Hong Bao-Fa, Wang Xiao-Xiong, Yang Yong, Cai Wei, Gao Jiang-Ping, Chen Yao-Fu, Zhang Cui-E

机构信息

Department of Urology, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Military Postgraduate Medical College, No. 28 Fuxing Road, Hai dian District, Beijing 100853, China.

出版信息

Asian J Androl. 2006 May;8(3):367-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7262.2006.00134.x.

Abstract

AIM

To explore the feasibility and safety of greenlight photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) on high-risk patients presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and to evaluate their clinical and voiding outcome.

METHODS

A total of 85 high-risk patients with obstructive BPH underwent PVP with an 80 W potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser, which was delivered through a side-deflecting fiber with a 23 Fr continuous flow cystoscope. Operative time, blood loss, indwelling catheterzation, international prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality of life score (QoL), uroflowmetry, postvoid residual urine volume and short-term complication rates were evaluated for all patients.

RESULTS

All patients got through the perioperative period safely. The chief advantages of PVP were: short operative time (25.6 +/- 7.6 min), little bleeding loss (56.8 +/- 14.3 mL) and short indwelling catheterization (1.6 +/- 0.8 d). The IPSS and QoL decreased from (29.6 +/- 5.4) and (5.4 +/- 0.6) to (9.5 +/- 2.6) and (1.3 +/- 0.6), respectively. The vast majority of patients were satisfied with voiding outcome. The mean maximal urinary flow rate increased to 17.8 mL/s and postvoid residual urine volume decreased to 55.6 mL. These results are significantly different from preoperative data (P < 0.05). No patient required blood transfusion or fluid absorption. There were few complications and very high patient satisfaction after operation.

CONCLUSION

PVP has a short operative time and high tolerance, and is safe, effective and minimally invasive for high-risk patients, therefore it might be considered as a good alternative treatment for high-risk patients with obstructive urinary symptoms as a result of BPH.

摘要

目的

探讨绿激光选择性前列腺汽化术(PVP)应用于有下尿路症状提示良性前列腺增生(BPH)的高危患者的可行性和安全性,并评估其临床及排尿效果。

方法

共85例高危梗阻性BPH患者接受了80W磷酸钛氧钾激光的PVP治疗,激光通过带有23Fr连续冲洗膀胱镜的侧射光纤传输。评估所有患者的手术时间、失血量、留置导尿情况、国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、生活质量评分(QoL)、尿流率、排尿后残余尿量及短期并发症发生率。

结果

所有患者均安全度过围手术期。PVP的主要优点为:手术时间短(25.6±7.6分钟)、失血量少(56.8±14.3毫升)及留置导尿时间短(1.6±0.8天)。IPSS和QoL分别从(29.6±5.4)和(5.4±0.6)降至(9.5±2.6)和(1.3±0.6)。绝大多数患者对排尿效果满意。平均最大尿流率增至17.8毫升/秒,排尿后残余尿量降至55.6毫升。这些结果与术前数据有显著差异(P<0.05)。无患者需要输血或液体吸收。术后并发症少,患者满意度高。

结论

PVP手术时间短、耐受性高,对高危患者安全、有效且微创,因此可被视为BPH所致梗阻性尿路症状高危患者的一种良好替代治疗方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验