Suppr超能文献

环磷酰胺与甲泼尼龙治疗系统性红斑狼疮神经精神受累的比较

Cyclophosphamide versus methylprednisolone for treating neuropsychiatric involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus.

作者信息

Trevisani V F M, Castro A A, Neves Neto J F, Atallah A N

机构信息

Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Rua Pedro de Toledo 598, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 04024 900.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19(2):CD002265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002265.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Neuropsychiatric involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus is complex and several clinical presentations are related to this disease such as: convulsions, chronic headache, transverse myelitis, vascular brain disease, psychosis and neural cognitive dysfunction. This systematic review is an update of a review performed in 2000.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of cyclophosphamide and methylprednisolone in the treatment of neuropsychiatric manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched EMBASE, LILACS, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and MEDLINE up to and including May 2005. Additional articles were sought through handsearching in relevant journals. There were no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials that compared cyclophosphamide to methylprednisolone were included. Patients of any age and gender were included as long as they fulfilled the criterion of the American College of Rheumatology for the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus and presented with any one of the following neuropsychiatric events: convulsions, organic brain syndrome and cranial neuropathy. Outcome measures included the following: a) overall mortality (primary event); b) motor and psychiatric deficit (primary event); c) clinical improvement (secondary event).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data was independently extracted by two reviewers and cross-checked. The methodological quality of each trial was assessed by the same two reviewers. Details of the randomisation (generation and concealment), blinding, and the number of patients lost to follow-up were recorded. Dichotomous data was presented as relative risks with corresponding 95% confidence intervals and a clinical relevance table was produced.

MAIN RESULTS

We found one randomised controlled trial of 32 patients comparing cyclophosphamide versus methylprednisolone for the treatment of neuropsychiatric involvement in the systemic lupus erythematosus. A significantly greater number of people responded to treatment in the cyclophosphamide group. Treatment response was found in 94.7% (18/19) of patients using cyclophosphamide compared with 46.2% (6/13) in the methylprednisolone group at 24 months (RR 2.05, 95% CI 1.13, 3.73) The NNT for response to treatment is 2. Cyclophosphamide use was associated with a reduction in prednisone requirements. A significant decrease in the number seizures per month was observed in the cyclophosphamide group. All the patients in the cyclophosphamide group had electroencephalographic improvement. No significant differences in adverse effects between the groups were found. It was not possible to extract more data from the study because there was a small number of patients in the others clinical subgroups of neurological manifestations and the authors did not provide sufficient information for data extraction.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review found one randomised controlled trial with a small number of patients in the different clinical subgroups of neurological manifestation. It seems that cyclophosphamide is more effective in the treatment of neuropsychiatric involvement in systemic erythematosus lupus compared with methylprednisolone. However, properly designed randomised controlled trials that involve large, representative numbers of individuals, with explicit clinical and laboratory diagnosis criteria, sufficient duration of follow-up and description of all relevant outcome measures are necessary to guide practice.

摘要

背景

系统性红斑狼疮的神经精神受累情况复杂,有多种临床表现与该病相关,如惊厥、慢性头痛、横贯性脊髓炎、脑血管疾病、精神病和神经认知功能障碍。本系统评价是对2000年所做评价的更新。

目的

评估环磷酰胺和甲泼尼龙治疗系统性红斑狼疮神经精神表现的疗效和安全性。

检索策略

我们检索了截至2005年5月的EMBASE、LILACS、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)和MEDLINE。通过手工检索相关期刊查找其他文章。无语言限制。

选择标准

纳入所有比较环磷酰胺与甲泼尼龙的随机对照试验。任何年龄和性别的患者,只要符合美国风湿病学会系统性红斑狼疮的诊断标准且出现以下任何一种神经精神事件:惊厥、器质性脑综合征和颅神经病变,均纳入。结局指标包括:a)总死亡率(主要事件);b)运动和精神缺陷(主要事件);c)临床改善(次要事件)。

数据收集与分析

由两名评价员独立提取数据并交叉核对。同两名评价员评估每个试验的方法学质量。记录随机化(产生和隐藏)、盲法以及失访患者数量的详细信息。二分类数据以相对危险度及相应的95%置信区间呈现,并制作临床相关性表。

主要结果

我们发现一项有32例患者的随机对照试验,比较环磷酰胺与甲泼尼龙治疗系统性红斑狼疮的神经精神受累情况。环磷酰胺组有更多患者对治疗有反应。在24个月时,使用环磷酰胺的患者中有94.7%(18/19)对治疗有反应,而甲泼尼龙组为46.2%(6/13)(RR 2.05,95%CI 1.13,3.73)。治疗反应的NNT为2。使用环磷酰胺与泼尼松需求减少相关。环磷酰胺组每月癫痫发作次数显著减少。环磷酰胺组所有患者脑电图均有改善。两组间不良反应无显著差异。由于神经表现的其他临床亚组患者数量少且作者未提供足够的数据提取信息,无法从该研究中提取更多数据。

作者结论

本系统评价发现一项随机对照试验,在神经表现的不同临床亚组中患者数量较少。与甲泼尼龙相比,环磷酰胺似乎在治疗系统性红斑狼疮的神经精神受累方面更有效。然而,需要设计合理的随机对照试验,纳入大量具有代表性的个体,有明确的临床和实验室诊断标准、足够的随访时间以及对所有相关结局指标的描述,以指导实践。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验