Gagnier J J, van Tulder M, Berman B, Bombardier C
Provincal Medical Centre, 5955 Ontario St., Unit 307, Windsor, Ontario, Canada, N8S1W6.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19(2):CD004504. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004504.pub3.
Low-back pain is a common condition and a substantial economic burden in industrialized societies. A large proportion of patients with chronic low-back pain use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), visit CAM practitioners, or both. Several herbal medicines have been purported for use in low-back pain.
To determine the effectiveness of herbal medicine for non-specific low-back pain.
We searched the following electronic databases: Cochrane Complementary Medicine Field Trials Register (Issue 3, 2005), MEDLINE (1966 to July 2005), EMBASE (1980 to July 2005); checked reference lists in review articles, guidelines and retrieved trials; and personally contacted individuals with expertise in this very specialized area.
We included randomized controlled trials, examining adults (over 18 years of age) suffering from acute, sub-acute or chronic non-specific low-back pain. The interventions were herbal medicines, defined as plants that are used for medicinal purposes in any form. Primary outcome measures were pain and function.
Two authors (JJG & MVT) conducted the database searches. One author contacted content experts and acquired relevant citations. Full references and abstracts of the identified studies were downloaded. A hard copy was retrieved for final inclusion decisions. Methodological quality and clinical relevance were assessed separately by two individuals. Disagreements were resolved by consensus.
Ten trials were included in this review. Two high quality trials examining the effects of Harpagophytum Procumbens (Devil's Claw) found strong evidence that daily doses standardized to 50 mg or 100 mg harpagoside were better than placebo for short-term improvements in pain and rescue medication. Another high quality trial demonstrated relative equivalence to 12.5 mg per day of rofecoxib (Vioxx). Two trials examining the effects of Salix Alba (White Willow Bark) found moderate evidence that daily doses standardized to 120 mg or 240 mg salicin were better than placebo for short-term improvements in pain and rescue medication. An additional trial demonstrated relative equivalence to 12.5 mg per day of rofecoxib. Three low quality trials on Capsicum Frutescens (Cayenne), examining various topical preparations, found moderate evidence that Capsicum Frutescens produced more favourable results than placebo and one trial found equivalence to a homeopathic ointment.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Harpagophytum Procumbens, Salix Alba and Capsicum Frutescens seem to reduce pain more than placebo. Additional trials testing these herbal medicines against standard treatments are needed. The quality of reporting in these trials was generally poor. Trialists should refer to the CONSORT statement extension for reporting trials of herbal medicine interventions.
腰痛在工业化社会中是一种常见病症,也是一项沉重的经济负担。很大一部分慢性腰痛患者使用补充和替代医学(CAM),或拜访CAM从业者,或两者皆有。有几种草药据说可用于治疗腰痛。
确定草药治疗非特异性腰痛的有效性。
我们检索了以下电子数据库:Cochrane补充医学领域试验注册库(2005年第3期)、MEDLINE(1966年至2005年7月)、EMBASE(1980年至2005年7月);检查综述文章、指南和检索到的试验中的参考文献列表;并亲自联系了这个非常专业领域的专家。
我们纳入了随机对照试验,研究对象为18岁以上患有急性、亚急性或慢性非特异性腰痛的成年人。干预措施为草药,定义为以任何形式用于药用目的的植物。主要结局指标为疼痛和功能。
两位作者(JJG和MVT)进行数据库检索。一位作者联系内容专家并获取相关引文。下载了已识别研究的完整参考文献和摘要。获取了一份硬拷贝以做出最终纳入决定。由两人分别评估方法学质量和临床相关性。分歧通过共识解决。
本综述纳入了10项试验。两项高质量试验研究了南非钩麻(魔鬼爪)的效果,发现有力证据表明,标准化为每日50毫克或100毫克哈帕甙的剂量在短期改善疼痛和急救药物方面比安慰剂更有效。另一项高质量试验表明其与每日12.5毫克罗非昔布(万络)效果相当。两项研究白柳树皮效果的试验发现适度证据表明,标准化为每日120毫克或240毫克水杨苷酸的剂量在短期改善疼痛和急救药物方面比安慰剂更有效。另一项试验表明其与每日12.5毫克罗非昔布效果相当。三项关于辣椒的低质量试验研究了各种外用制剂,发现适度证据表明辣椒比安慰剂产生更有利的结果,且一项试验发现其与一种顺势疗法制剂效果相当。
南非钩麻、白柳树皮和辣椒似乎比安慰剂更能减轻疼痛。需要进行更多试验,将这些草药与标准治疗方法进行对比。这些试验的报告质量普遍较差。试验者应参考CONSORT声明扩展版来报告草药干预试验。