Foster J, Richards R, Showell M
University of Sydney, QE11 Building (DO2) Building, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2006.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19(2):CD005248. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005248.pub2.
Venous access is an essential part of caring for the sick neonate; however, problems such as contamination of fluids with bacteria, endotoxins and particulates have been associated with intravenous infusion therapy. Intravenous in-line filters claim to be an effective strategy for the removal of bacteria, endotoxins and particulates associated with intravenous therapy in adults and are increasingly being recommended for use in neonates.
To assess whether in-line filters on intravenous lines prevent morbidity and mortality in neonates.
Searches were made of the electronic databases MEDLINE (from 1966 to September 2005), EMBASE (from 1980 to September 2005), CINAHL (from 1982 to September 2005) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 3 2005 ). There was no language restriction. Further searching included cross references, abstracts, conferences, symposia proceedings, expert informants and journal handsearching.
Randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials that compared the use of intravenous in-line filters with placebo or nothing in neonates were included in the review.
The procedures of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group (CNRG) were followed throughout. Titles and abstracts identified from the search were checked by the review authors. The full text of all studies of possible relevance were obtained. The review authors independently assessed the trials for their methodological quality and subsequent inclusion in the review. Statistical analysis followed the procedures of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. Dichotomous data is expressed as relative risk and 95% confidence intervals, and risk difference and 95% confidence intervals.
There were three eligible studies, which recruited a total of 262 neonates. For most of the outcomes for this review, only one study of 88 neonates contributed eligible data. This review found no significant effect of in-line filters in any of the reported outcomes of overall mortality, proven and unproven septicaemia, phlebitis, necrotizing enterocolitis, duration of cannula patency, number of catheters inserted and financial costs.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There are insufficient data to determine whether or not the use of intravenous in-line filters prevent morbidity and mortality in neonates. The wide confidence intervals on outcomes indicate the imprecise estimates of treatment effect due to the small numbers of patients and events.
静脉通路是护理患病新生儿的重要组成部分;然而,诸如液体被细菌、内毒素和微粒污染等问题一直与静脉输液治疗相关。静脉内在线过滤器据称是一种有效策略,可去除与成人静脉治疗相关的细菌、内毒素和微粒,并且越来越多地被推荐用于新生儿。
评估静脉输液管上的在线过滤器是否能预防新生儿的发病和死亡。
检索了电子数据库MEDLINE(1966年至2005年9月)、EMBASE(1980年至2005年9月)、CINAHL(1982年至2005年9月)以及Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL,Cochrane图书馆,2005年第3期)。无语言限制。进一步检索包括交叉参考文献、摘要、会议、专题讨论会论文集、专家提供的信息以及期刊手工检索。
本综述纳入了将静脉内在线过滤器与安慰剂或不使用任何过滤器在新生儿中进行比较的随机或半随机对照试验。
自始至终遵循Cochrane新生儿综述小组(CNRG)的程序。综述作者检查从检索中识别出的标题和摘要。获取所有可能相关研究的全文。综述作者独立评估试验的方法学质量以及随后是否纳入综述。统计分析遵循Cochrane新生儿综述小组的程序。二分数据以相对风险和95%置信区间以及风险差值和95%置信区间表示。
有三项符合条件的研究,共纳入262名新生儿。对于本综述的大多数结局,仅有一项纳入88名新生儿的研究提供了符合条件的数据。本综述发现,在线过滤器在总体死亡率、确诊和未确诊败血症、静脉炎、坏死性小肠结肠炎、套管通畅持续时间、插入导管数量以及费用等任何报告结局中均无显著效果。
尚无足够数据确定使用静脉内在线过滤器是否能预防新生儿的发病和死亡。结局的宽泛置信区间表明,由于患者和事件数量较少,对治疗效果的估计并不精确。