Webb S M, Sucunza N, Barahona M J
Department of Endocrinology, Hospital Sant Pau, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Spain.
J Endocrinol Invest. 2005;28(11 Suppl International):84-6.
There is evidence that the Cortina criteria for the cure of acromegaly are not strict enough if the aim is to predict patients where cure will be successful as opposed to patients who will suffer disease recurrence or will have mortality and morbidity return to disease-like levels. These criteria depend on biochemical measurements of GH and IGF-I that are not universally standardised or comparable, even when excluding the older, less sensitive polyclonal radio immuno assay (RIA). The biochemical evidence suggesting a revision of the criteria for curing acromegaly and derived proposals can be summarised as follows: A) Using immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) for GH measurement, no acromegalic patient with elevated IGF-I suppressed GH after 100 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) to < or = 0.14 microg/l, but 50% suppressed to <1microg/l. B) With hourly GH measurements using IRMA, cured acromegalic patients exhibit basal GH values < or = 0.33 microg/l (x +/- 2 SD). C) In patients with normal IGF-I having GH after OGTT suppressed to < or = 0.14microg/l no recurrences were observed, while in 19% with GH >0.14 microg/ showed recurrences (4, 5); however, this was not the experience of others. D) Polyclonal assays for GH exhibit overlap of GH suppression after OGTT between normal subjects and active patients and should therefore be avoided. E) A recent agreement for implementing universal rhGH reference standards by September 2006 will hopefully facilitate the comparison of different assays in the future. F) Reliable IGF-I assays require age- and sex-matched reference ranges. G) For evaluation of long-term biochemical assessment after treatment, both GH and IGF-I should be undertaken. H) In order to monitor treatment with GH-receptor antagonists, a reliable IGF-I assay is of critical importance, since GH measurements cannot be used to evaluate treatment efficacy.
有证据表明,如果目标是预测治愈成功的患者,而非疾病复发或死亡率和发病率恢复到疾病水平的患者,那么用于治疗肢端肥大症的科尔蒂纳标准不够严格。这些标准依赖于生长激素(GH)和胰岛素样生长因子-1(IGF-I)的生化测量,即使排除较旧且不太敏感的多克隆放射免疫测定法(RIA),这些测量也未得到普遍标准化或具有可比性。表明需要修订肢端肥大症治愈标准及相关提议的生化证据可总结如下:A)使用免疫放射测定法(IRMA)测量GH时,口服100克葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)后,IGF-I升高的肢端肥大症患者中,无患者的GH被抑制至≤0.14微克/升,但50%的患者被抑制至<1微克/升。B)使用IRMA每小时测量GH时,治愈的肢端肥大症患者的基础GH值≤0.33微克/升(x±2标准差)。C)IGF-I正常且OGTT后GH被抑制至≤0.14微克/升的患者未观察到复发,而GH>0.14微克/升的患者中有(19%)出现复发(4,5);然而,其他人并无此经验。D)GH的多克隆测定法显示正常受试者和活跃患者在OGTT后GH抑制存在重叠,因此应避免使用。E)最近达成的到2006年9月实施通用重组人生长激素(rhGH)参考标准的协议有望在未来促进不同测定法之间的比较。F)可靠的IGF-I测定需要年龄和性别匹配的参考范围。G)为评估治疗后的长期生化评估,应同时进行GH和IGF-I测定。H)为监测生长激素受体拮抗剂的治疗,可靠的IGF-I测定至关重要,因为GH测量不能用于评估治疗效果。