• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[助听器:线性和非线性放大用户的客观与主观评估]

[Hearing aids: objective and subjective evaluations of linear and nonlinear amplification users].

作者信息

Costa Letícia Pimenta, Iório Maria Cecília Martinelli

机构信息

Curso de Fonoaudiologia da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.

出版信息

Pro Fono. 2006 Jan-Apr;18(1):21-30. doi: 10.1590/s0104-56872006000100004.

DOI:10.1590/s0104-56872006000100004
PMID:16625868
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sensorineural hearing impaired individuals benefit themselves with the use of nonlinear amplification, once the compression tries to reestablish the sensation of normal loudness. However, the literature is still controversial in relation to the benefits for speech recognition in users of linear and nonlinear hearing aids.

AIM

For this reason, the purpose of this study was to compare the performance of linear and nonlinear hearing aid users through objective and subjective evaluations, verifying the best circuit for hearing adaptation and speech recognition in silence and in noise.

METHOD

21 bilateral hearing aid users, who had been using the hearing aid for at least 3 months, with 12 to 64 years of age and with mild to moderate-severe hearing losses were studied according to the type of amplification used, forming two groups: linear group composed by 10 linear hearing aid users; and nonlinear group, composed by 11 nonlinear hearing aid users. Speech recognition tests were applied in silence and in noise, as well as the International Outcome Inventory of Hearing Aids questionnaire.

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences were not observed between the groups for the speech recognition tests, in silence and in noise, and for the questionnaire.

CONCLUSION

It can be concluded that no difference exists in the performance of linear and nonlinear hearing aids users, regarding the objective evaluations (speech tests) and the subjective evaluations (questionnaire), that indicate a better adaptation or a better speech recognition in silence or in noise.

摘要

背景

感音神经性听力受损者使用非线性放大技术会受益,因为压缩技术试图重建正常响度的感觉。然而,关于线性和非线性助听器使用者在言语识别方面的益处,文献中仍存在争议。

目的

因此,本研究的目的是通过客观和主观评估比较线性和非线性助听器使用者的表现,验证在安静和噪声环境下听力适应和言语识别的最佳电路。

方法

根据所使用的放大类型,对21名双侧助听器使用者进行了研究,这些使用者使用助听器至少3个月,年龄在12至64岁之间,听力损失为轻度至中度重度,分为两组:线性组由10名线性助听器使用者组成;非线性组由11名非线性助听器使用者组成。在安静和噪声环境下进行言语识别测试,并应用助听器国际结果量表问卷。

结果

在安静和噪声环境下的言语识别测试以及问卷方面,两组之间未观察到统计学上的显著差异。

结论

可以得出结论,在线性和非线性助听器使用者的表现方面,客观评估(言语测试)和主观评估(问卷)均未显示出差异,这些评估表明在安静或噪声环境下有更好的适应性或更好的言语识别能力。

相似文献

1
[Hearing aids: objective and subjective evaluations of linear and nonlinear amplification users].[助听器:线性和非线性放大用户的客观与主观评估]
Pro Fono. 2006 Jan-Apr;18(1):21-30. doi: 10.1590/s0104-56872006000100004.
2
[Study of benefit and of acclimatization in recent users of hearing aids].[助听器近期使用者的获益及适应性研究]
Pro Fono. 2007 Jan-Apr;19(1):39-48. doi: 10.1590/s0104-56872007000100005.
3
Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.老年人使用非线性频率压缩助听器的噪声言语感知和聆听努力。
Ear Hear. 2018 Mar/Apr;39(2):215-225. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000481.
4
Speech recognition ability in noise and its relationship to perceived hearing aid benefit.噪声环境下的语音识别能力及其与助听器受益感知的关系。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2000 Oct;11(9):475-83.
5
Field trials using a digital hearing aid with active noise reduction and dual-microphone directionality.使用具有主动降噪和双麦克风指向性的数字助听器进行现场试验。
Audiology. 2000 Sep-Oct;39(5):260-8. doi: 10.3109/00206090009073090.
6
[Acclimatization: speech recognition in hearing aid users].[适应:助听器使用者的语音识别]
Pro Fono. 2006 Sep-Dec;18(3):259-66. doi: 10.1590/s0104-56872006000300005.
7
Acclimatization to hearing aids.助听器适应。
Ear Hear. 2014 Mar-Apr;35(2):203-12. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182a8eda4.
8
Is normal or less than normal overall loudness preferred by first-time hearing aid users?初次使用助听器的用户更喜欢正常音量还是低于正常的整体音量?
Ear Hear. 2004 Apr;25(2):159-72. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000120364.13671.e2.
9
Effects of three amplification strategies on speech perception by children with severe and profound hearing loss.三种放大策略对重度和极重度听力损失儿童言语感知的影响。
Ear Hear. 2005 Feb;26(1):35-47. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200502000-00004.
10
Effects of nonlinear frequency compression on Mandarin speech and sound-quality perception in hearing-aid users.非线性频率压缩对助听器使用者的普通话语音感知和音质感知的影响。
Int J Audiol. 2020 Jul;59(7):524-533. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1761035. Epub 2020 May 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Hearing aids and recovery times: a study according to cognitive status.助听器与恢复时间:基于认知状态的研究
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Mar-Apr;79(2):177-84. doi: 10.5935/1808-8694.20130032.
2
Profile of patients with cleft palate fitted with hearing AIDS.腭裂患者佩戴助听器的情况分析。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Nov-Dec;75(6):888-92. doi: 10.1016/s1808-8694(15)30555-3.