Suppr超能文献

三种自酸蚀粘结剂粘结正畸托槽的剪切粘结强度

Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets with 3 self-etch adhesives.

作者信息

Arhun Neslihan, Arman Ayça, Sesen Cagla, Karabulut Erdem, Korkmaz Yonca, Gokalp Saadet

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Apr;129(4):547-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.12.006.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to compare shear bond strength and mode of failure of brackets bonded with 3 self-etching products.

METHODS

The products tested were (1) a recently developed, modified self-etching, 1-step adhesive system (Adper Prompt L-Pop Self Etch Adhesive, 3M, St Paul, Minn); (2) a new fluoride-releasing, antibacterial, self-etching adhesive system (Clearfil Protect Bond, Kuraray, Osaka, Japan); and (3) a fluoride-releasing, self-etching adhesive system (Transbond Plus Self Etching Primer, 3M). Thirty-six defect-free premolars were randomly divided into 3 groups (n = 12 each), and metal brackets were bonded according to the manufacturer's instructions. Brackets were debonded in shear on a universal testing machine with a crosshead speed of 1 mm per minute.

RESULTS

One-way ANOVA showed a statistically significant (P < .001) difference between groups. Group 2 had the highest shear bond strength. The difference between groups 1 and 3 was not statistically significant. The Kruskal-Wallis test showed no significant differences in the ARI scores (P = .595; P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The fluoride-releasing, antibacterial, self-etching adhesive system, Clearfil Protect Bond, produced greater shear bond strength than the other 2 products tested and could be considered for clinical use.

摘要

引言

本研究的目的是比较用3种自酸蚀产品粘结托槽的剪切粘结强度和失效模式。

方法

所测试的产品为:(1)一种最近开发的改良型单步自酸蚀粘结系统(Adper Prompt L-Pop自酸蚀粘结剂,3M公司,明尼苏达州圣保罗);(2)一种新型含氟、抗菌的自酸蚀粘结系统(Clearfil Protect Bond,可乐丽公司,日本大阪);(3)一种含氟的自酸蚀粘结系统(Transbond Plus自酸蚀底漆,3M公司)。36颗无缺陷的前磨牙随机分为3组(每组n = 12),按照制造商的说明粘结金属托槽。在万能试验机上以每分钟1毫米的十字头速度进行托槽剪切脱粘试验。

结果

单因素方差分析显示组间差异有统计学意义(P < .001)。第2组的剪切粘结强度最高。第1组和第3组之间的差异无统计学意义。Kruskal-Wallis检验显示ARI评分无显著差异(P = .595;P < .05)。

结论

含氟、抗菌的自酸蚀粘结系统Clearfil Protect Bond比其他2种测试产品产生更高的剪切粘结强度,可考虑临床使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验