Key Laboratory of Oral Medicine, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Guangzhou Medical University, 59 Huangsha Thoroughfare, Guangzhou, 510140, China,
Mol Biol Rep. 2013 Dec;40(12):7053-9. doi: 10.1007/s11033-013-2826-6. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
This study aimed to investigate the interaction of current one-bottle self-etching adhesives and Er:YAG laser with dentin using a tensile bond strength (TBS) test and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) in vitro. Two hundred and thirteen dentin discs were randomly distributed to the Control Group using bur cutting and to the Laser Group using an Er:YAG laser (200 mJ, VSP, 20 Hz). The following adhesives were investigated: one two-step total-etch adhesive [Prime & Bond NT (Dentsply)] and four one-step self-etch adhesives [G-Bond plus (GC), XENO V (Dentsply), iBond Self Etch (Heraeus) and Adper Easy One (3 M ESPE)]. Samples were restored with composite resin, and after 24-hour storage in distilled water, subjected to the TBS test. For morphological analysis, 12 dentin specimens were prepared for SEM. No significant differences were found between the control group and laser group (p = 0.899); dentin subjected to Prime & Bond NT, XENOV and Adper Easy One produced higher TBS. In conclusion, this study indicates that Er:YAG laser-prepared dentin can perform as well as bur on TBS, and some of the one-step one-bottle adhesives are comparable to the total-etch adhesives in TBS on dentin.
本研究旨在通过拉伸结合强度(TBS)测试和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)体外研究目前的单瓶自酸蚀黏合剂与牙本质的相互作用。使用涡轮手机切割将 213 个牙本质片随机分配到对照组,使用 Er:YAG 激光(200mJ,VSP,20Hz)将其分配到激光组。研究了以下黏合剂:一种两步全酸蚀黏合剂[Prime&Bond NT(登士柏)]和四种一步自酸蚀黏合剂[G-Bond plus(GC)、XENO V(登士柏)、iBond Self Etch(贺利氏)和 Adper Easy One(3M ESPE)]。样本用复合树脂修复,在蒸馏水中储存 24 小时后,进行 TBS 测试。为了进行形态分析,制备了 12 个牙本质样本进行 SEM。对照组和激光组之间没有发现显著差异(p=0.899);Prime&Bond NT、XENOV 和 Adper Easy One 处理的牙本质产生的 TBS 更高。综上所述,本研究表明,Er:YAG 激光制备的牙本质在 TBS 方面与涡轮手机相当,并且一些一步单瓶黏合剂在 TBS 方面与全酸蚀黏合剂相当。