Hewson Claire, Charlton John P
Department of Psychology and Life Sciences, University of Bolton, Deane Rd., Bolton, BL3 5AB, England.
Behav Res Methods. 2005 Nov;37(4):691-702. doi: 10.3758/bf03192742.
A growing number of studies have supported the use of unidimensional psychometric test instruments administered via the Internet; however, support for the use of multidimensional scales is weak. The present study compares paper and Internet administrations of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC) Scale (Wallston & Wallston, 1981). In terms of reliabilities and factor structures, the Internet data were found to be at least as good as the paper data. MHLC scores were comparable for paper and Internet administrations, although the Internet sample scored significantly lower on the Powerful Others subscale. Overall, the results show that administration of the MHLC Scale via the Internet can produce data comparable to that obtained by pen-and-paper methods. However, it is concluded that generalization of these findings beyond the psychometric test instrument and sampling procedures used here is not warranted.
越来越多的研究支持通过互联网使用单维度心理测量测试工具;然而,对使用多维度量表的支持却很薄弱。本研究比较了多维健康控制点(MHLC)量表(沃尔斯顿和沃尔斯顿,1981年)的纸质版和网络版。在信度和因子结构方面,发现网络数据至少与纸质数据一样好。纸质版和网络版的MHLC得分相当,尽管网络样本在“有势力的他人”子量表上的得分显著较低。总体而言,结果表明通过互联网施测MHLC量表能够产生与纸笔方法获得的数据相当的数据。然而,得出的结论是,在此处使用的心理测量测试工具和抽样程序之外推广这些发现是没有根据的。