Suppr超能文献

品行障碍的外行概念:非专业人士是通过综合征症状还是内部功能障碍来区分障碍与犯罪行为?

The lay concept of conduct disorder: do nonprofessionals use syndromal symptoms or internal dysfunction to distinguish disorder from delinquency?

作者信息

Wakefield Jerome C, Kirk Stuart A, Pottick Kathleen J, Hsieh Derek K, Tian Xin

机构信息

School of Social Work, New York University, NY 10003, USA.

出版信息

Can J Psychiatry. 2006 Mar;51(4):210-7. doi: 10.1177/070674370605100402.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Conduct disorder (CD) must be distinguished from nondisordered delinquent behaviour to avoid false positives, especially when diagnosing youth from difficult environments. However, the nature of this distinction remains controversial. The DSM-IV observes that its own syndromal CD diagnostic criteria conflict with its definition of mental disorder, which requires that symptoms be considered a manifestation of internal dysfunction to warrant disorder diagnosis. Previous research indicates that professional judgments tend to be guided by the dysfunction requirement, not syndromal symptoms alone. However, there are almost no data on lay conceptualizations. Thus it remains unknown whether judgments about CD are anchored in a broadly shared understanding of mental disorder that provides a basis for professional-lay consensus.

OBJECTIVE

The present study tests which conception of CD, syndromal-symptoms or dysfunction-requirement, corresponds most closely to lay judgments of disorder or nondisorder and compares lay and professional judgments. We hypothesized that lay disorder judgments, like professional judgments, tend to presuppose the dysfunction requirement.

METHOD

Three lay samples (nonclinical social workers, nonpsychiatric nurses, and undergraduates) rated their agreement that youths described in clinical vignettes have a mental disorder. All vignettes satisfied DSM-IV CD diagnostic criteria. Vignettes were varied to present syndromal symptoms only, symptoms suggesting internal dysfunction, and symptoms resulting from reactions to negative circumstances, without dysfunction.

RESULTS

All lay samples attributed disorder more often to youths whose symptoms suggested internal dysfunction than to youths with similar symptoms but without a likely dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

The dysfunction requirement appears to reflect a widely shared lay and professional concept of disorder.

摘要

背景

品行障碍(CD)必须与无紊乱的违纪行为相区分,以避免误诊,尤其是在诊断来自困难环境的青少年时。然而,这种区分的本质仍存在争议。《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版》(DSM-IV)指出,其自身的品行障碍综合征诊断标准与其精神障碍的定义相冲突,精神障碍的定义要求症状被视为内部功能障碍的表现才能确诊为疾病。先前的研究表明,专业判断往往受功能障碍要求的指导,而不仅仅是综合征症状。然而,几乎没有关于外行概念化的数据。因此,关于品行障碍的判断是否基于对精神障碍的广泛共识,从而为专业人士和外行提供共识基础,仍然未知。

目的

本研究测试哪种品行障碍概念,即综合征症状概念或功能障碍要求概念,与外行对紊乱或无紊乱的判断最接近,并比较外行和专业判断。我们假设,外行对紊乱的判断,与专业判断一样,往往预先假定功能障碍要求。

方法

三个外行样本(非临床社会工作者、非精神科护士和本科生)对他们是否同意临床案例中描述的青少年患有精神障碍进行评分。所有案例均符合DSM-IV品行障碍诊断标准。案例有所不同,仅呈现综合征症状、提示内部功能障碍的症状以及对负面情况的反应所导致的症状(无功能障碍)。

结果

所有外行样本将障碍更多地归因于症状提示内部功能障碍的青少年,而非具有相似症状但可能无功能障碍的青少年。

结论

功能障碍要求似乎反映了广泛共享的外行和专业的疾病概念。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验