Dobrzanska Linda, Newell Robert
Bradford City Teaching Primary Care Trust, Department of Community and Primary Care, University of Bradford, Health Studies, Bradford, Yorkshire, UK.
J Clin Nurs. 2006 May;15(5):599-606. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01333.x.
To identify the reasons that may have contributed to the emergency readmission of older people to a medical unit, within 28 days of hospital discharge.
The current UK Government has initiatives in place to monitor quality and service delivery of NHS organizations. This is achieved by setting, delivering and monitoring standards, one of which is 'emergency readmission to hospital within 28 days of discharge (all ages), as a percentage of live discharges'.
DESIGN/METHOD: A year-long study examined reasons for unplanned readmission of patients (aged 77 and over) within 28 days of hospital discharge. The population was patients, registered with North Bradford PCT General Practitioners, readmitted to one of five care of older people wards in two local acute trust NHS hospitals. Patient records were scrutinized and data related to demography, diagnosis and readmission were collected using a structured extraction tool. Data analysis was undertaken using descriptive statistics and identification of differences and correlations within the data.
A pilot study indicated patients readmitted from home vs. other sources and patients discharged to home vs. other sources had a significantly shorter stay on readmission. The main study showed other significant findings. Patients who lived in care were readmitted sooner than those who lived at home: those discharged home vs. other sources and agreeing to increased social service provision had longer stays on readmission. Shorter length of stay on index admission (up to 72 hours) was associated with increased likelihood of earlier readmission.
A framework of factors was identified and could be used to target resources to meet patients' needs more flexibly.
It is possible that the process of targeting resources to 'at-risk' patients might enable services to be delivered in a more cost-efficient and cost-effective way.
确定在医院出院28天内可能导致老年人再次紧急入住医疗科室的原因。
英国现任政府已采取措施监测国民医疗服务体系(NHS)各机构的质量和服务提供情况。这是通过设定、执行和监测标准来实现的,其中一项标准是“出院28天内再次紧急入院(所有年龄段)占实际出院人数的百分比”。
设计/方法:一项为期一年的研究调查了77岁及以上患者在医院出院28天内非计划再次入院的原因。研究对象是在北布拉德福德初级保健信托基金(PCT)全科医生处注册、再次入住当地两家急性信托NHS医院中五个老年护理病房之一的患者。仔细审查患者记录,并使用结构化提取工具收集与人口统计学、诊断和再次入院相关的数据。使用描述性统计方法进行数据分析,并确定数据中的差异和相关性。
一项试点研究表明,与从其他来源再次入院的患者相比,从家中再次入院的患者以及与出院回家而非其他地方的患者再次住院时间明显更短。主要研究还得出了其他重要发现。住在护理机构的患者比住在家里的患者更早再次入院;出院回家而非其他地方且同意增加社会服务提供的患者再次住院时间更长。首次入院住院时间较短(最长72小时)与更早再次入院的可能性增加相关。
确定了一个因素框架,可用于更灵活地分配资源以满足患者需求。
针对“高危”患者分配资源的过程有可能使服务以更具成本效益和性价比的方式提供。