Gautam P, Macduff C, Brown I, Squair J
Department of Medicine for the Elderly Woodend Hospital, Aberdeen.
Health Bull (Edinb). 1996 Nov;54(6):449-57.
This study was undertaken to determine the prevalence of unplanned readmissions in Geriatric Medicine in Aberdeen and to examine their nature in order to establish how many of them were avoidable.
Patients living within Aberdeen who were discharged from Care of the Elderly Assessment Wards in one hospital between 1 August 1994 and 31 January 1995 were identified. Any subsequent unplanned readmissions of this population to any local hospital within 28 days were identified and formed the study's sample. Subsequent comparison with the non-readmitted population yielded readmission rates. The nature of each episode was investigated by obtaining a wide range of data (e.g. from medical and nursing notes) soon after readmission and by the audit team subsequently identifying principal and associated causative factors. A questionnaire was also sent to the discharging consultant and the patient's GP seeking opinions on whether readmission was avoidable and these were weighted equally with the audit team's opinion in order to establish avoidability.
The patients were all discharged from the nine Care of the Elderly Assessment wards at Woodend Hospital in Aberdeen and readmitted to any NHS hospital within Aberdeen.
The subjects were patients living within Aberdeen who satisfied the above criteria.
There were 109 episodes of readmission resulting from 713 discharges, making a readmission rate of 15.3%. The readmitted population was elderly with multiple medical problems; 50% lived alone. In 87% of cases the principal causative factor in readmission was medical, most commonly involving relapse of illness. The remaining 13% were 'social' in nature. Response rates to the questionnaire by GP's and Consultants were excellent (96% and 99% respectively) and 34 cases emerged where either party, or both, thought readmission to be avoidable. These cases were subject to further review by the audit team and in this way 16 of the 34 cases were judged to be avoidable. The main area for improvement was considered to be pre-discharge assessment of home circumstances.
The majority of unplanned readmissions were medical in nature and unavoidable. The use of rates of unplanned readmission as a measure of clinical outcome in care of the elderly is unsatisfactory as they do not accurately reflect the quality of in-patient care.
本研究旨在确定阿伯丁老年医学中计划外再入院的发生率,并研究其性质,以确定其中有多少是可以避免的。
确定1994年8月1日至1995年1月31日期间从阿伯丁一家医院的老年评估病房出院的居住在阿伯丁的患者。确定该人群随后在28天内任何当地医院的任何计划外再入院情况,并将其作为研究样本。随后将再入院人群与未再入院人群进行比较,得出再入院率。通过在再入院后不久获取广泛的数据(例如来自医疗和护理记录)以及审计团队随后确定主要和相关的致病因素,来调查每个事件的性质。还向出院顾问和患者的全科医生发送了一份问卷,征求他们对再入院是否可以避免的意见,这些意见与审计团队的意见同等加权,以确定可避免性。
所有患者均从阿伯丁伍德恩德医院的九个老年评估病房出院,并再次入住阿伯丁的任何国民保健服务医院。
对象是居住在阿伯丁且符合上述标准的患者。
713例出院导致109次再入院,再入院率为15.3%。再入院人群为老年人,有多种医疗问题;50%独自生活。在87%的病例中,再入院的主要致病因素是医疗方面的,最常见的是疾病复发。其余13%本质上是“社会”因素。全科医生和顾问对问卷的回复率很高(分别为96%和99%),有34例出现一方或双方认为再入院是可以避免的情况。审计团队对这些病例进行了进一步审查,通过这种方式,34例病例中有16例被判定为可以避免。认为主要的改进领域是出院前对家庭情况的评估。
大多数计划外再入院本质上是医疗性的且不可避免。将计划外再入院率用作老年护理临床结果的衡量标准并不令人满意,因为它们不能准确反映住院护理的质量。