• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床判断在急性阑尾炎的诊断中仍然具有重要价值。

Clinical judgment remains of great value in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

作者信息

Bergeron Eric

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Charles-LeMoyne Hospital, Greenfield Park, QC.

出版信息

Can J Surg. 2006 Apr;49(2):96-100.

PMID:16630419
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3207532/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Observation and repeated examination may lead to favourable clinical outcomes in the ever-challenging diagnosis of appendicitis. The goal of this study was to evaluate clinical performance in the diagnosis of suspected appendicitis in a centre with limited access to medical imaging technologies and to identify factors associated with complicated cases.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the medical records of 211 consecutive surgical cases of suspected appendicitis, spanning an 11-year period, was performed. The delays before treatment and the subsequent patient outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were 8.1% of cases with negative findings on appendectomy, 75.8% with uncomplicated appendicitis, 12.3% with complicated appendicitis and 3.8% with other surgical conditions. The delay before the first medical consultation was significantly longer in patients with complicated appendicitis. The various delays after the first medical consultation did not differ significantly between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In the context of limited available medical imaging modalities, clinical observation was not associated with an increased incidence of complicated appendicitis. The presence of complicated appendicitis was associated with the delay before the patient's first medical consultation. Clinical judgment can be prioritized and can lead to good clinical performance in the management of patients with suspected appendicitis, with no significant increase in rates of complicated appendicitis and negative findings on appendectomy.

摘要

背景

在阑尾炎这一颇具挑战性的诊断过程中,观察和反复检查可能会带来良好的临床结果。本研究的目的是评估在医疗影像技术获取受限的中心对疑似阑尾炎的诊断临床效能,并确定与复杂病例相关的因素。

方法

对连续211例疑似阑尾炎手术病例的医疗记录进行了为期11年的回顾性研究。评估了治疗前的延迟时间以及随后的患者结局。

结果

阑尾切除术中发现阴性结果的病例占8.1%,单纯性阑尾炎病例占75.8%,复杂性阑尾炎病例占12.3%,其他外科疾病病例占3.8%。复杂性阑尾炎患者首次就医前的延迟时间明显更长。首次就医后的各种延迟在各组之间无显著差异。

结论

在可用医疗影像检查手段有限的情况下,临床观察与复杂性阑尾炎发病率的增加无关。复杂性阑尾炎的存在与患者首次就医前的延迟有关。在疑似阑尾炎患者的管理中,临床判断可作为优先考虑因素,且可带来良好的临床效果,复杂性阑尾炎的发生率和阑尾切除术中的阴性结果均无显著增加。

相似文献

1
Clinical judgment remains of great value in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.临床判断在急性阑尾炎的诊断中仍然具有重要价值。
Can J Surg. 2006 Apr;49(2):96-100.
2
Appendicitis is a place for clinical judgement.
Am J Surg. 1999 Jun;177(6):460-2. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)00092-6.
3
Diagnostic accuracy of doctors at the emergency department and radiologists in differentiating between complicated and uncomplicated acute appendicitis.急诊科医生和放射科医生在鉴别复杂型与单纯型急性阑尾炎方面的诊断准确性。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Jun;50(3):837-845. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02442-2. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
4
Surgical decision-making in acute appendicitis.急性阑尾炎的手术决策
BMC Surg. 2015 Jun 2;15:69. doi: 10.1186/s12893-015-0053-x.
5
Do we need imaging to diagnose appendicitis in children?我们需要影像学检查来诊断儿童阑尾炎吗?
Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2013 Apr-Jun;10(2):68-73. doi: 10.4103/0189-6725.115024.
6
False-negative and false-positive errors in abdominal pain evaluation: failure to diagnose acute appendicitis and unnecessary surgery.腹痛评估中的假阴性和假阳性错误:急性阑尾炎漏诊与不必要的手术。
Acad Emerg Med. 2000 Nov;7(11):1244-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb00470.x.
7
The role of imaging in children with suspected appendicitis: the UK perspective.影像学在疑似阑尾炎儿童中的作用:英国视角
Pediatr Radiol. 2007 Jan;37(1):5-9. doi: 10.1007/s00247-006-0304-1. Epub 2006 Nov 11.
8
Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Complicated Acute Appendicitis in the Elderly: A Single-center Experience.老年复杂性急性阑尾炎的腹腔镜阑尾切除术:单中心经验
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017 Oct;27(5):366-368. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000447.
9
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on appendicitis treatment in Germany-a population-based analysis.COVID-19 大流行对德国阑尾炎治疗的影响-基于人群的分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Mar;406(2):377-383. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02081-4. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
10
Clinical characteristics and application value of risk prediction models of acute appendicitis in rural Tibet: a retrospective study.西藏农村地区急性阑尾炎风险预测模型的临床特征及应用价值:一项回顾性研究。
Rural Remote Health. 2023 Oct;23(4):7709. doi: 10.22605/RRH7709. Epub 2023 Oct 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Abdominal Ultrasound and Its Diagnostic Accuracy in Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis: A Meta-Analysis.腹部超声及其在诊断急性阑尾炎中的诊断准确性:一项荟萃分析。
Front Surg. 2021 Jun 28;8:707160. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.707160. eCollection 2021.
2
In Reply: May Cooler Heads Prevail During a Pandemic: Stroke in COVID-19 Patients or COVID-19 in Stroke Patients?回复:在大流行期间能否保持冷静:COVID-19患者的中风还是中风患者的COVID-19?
Neurosurgery. 2020 Nov 16;87(6):E691-E693. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa384.
3
Ruling out Appendicitis in Children: Can We Use Clinical Prediction Rules?排除儿童阑尾炎:我们能否使用临床预测规则?
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Oct;23(10):2027-2048. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3997-1. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
4
Diagnostic Accuracy of Abdominal Ultrasound for Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.腹部超声诊断急性阑尾炎的诊断准确性:系统评价与Meta分析
World J Surg. 2017 Mar;41(3):693-700. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3792-7.
5
Clinicopathological review of 156 appendicectomies for acute appendicitis in children in Ile-Ife, Nigeria: a retrospective analysis.尼日利亚伊莱-伊费地区156例儿童急性阑尾炎阑尾切除术的临床病理回顾:一项回顾性分析
BMC Emerg Med. 2015 May 9;15:7. doi: 10.1186/s12873-015-0030-9.
6
Diagnosing appendicitis: evidence-based review of the diagnostic approach in 2014.阑尾炎的诊断:2014年诊断方法的循证综述
West J Emerg Med. 2014 Nov;15(7):859-71. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2014.9.21568. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
7
Missed appendicitis: mimicking urologic symptoms.漏诊阑尾炎:酷似泌尿系统症状
Case Rep Urol. 2012;2012:571037. doi: 10.1155/2012/571037. Epub 2012 Dec 26.
8
Is hyperbilirubinaemia in appendicitis a better predictor of perforation than C-reactive protein? - a prospective study.阑尾炎中的高胆红素血症比C反应蛋白更能预测穿孔吗?——一项前瞻性研究。
Indian J Surg. 2009 Oct;71(5):265-72. doi: 10.1007/s12262-009-0074-8. Epub 2009 Oct 17.

本文引用的文献

1
A prospective randomized study of clinical assessment versus computed tomography for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.一项关于临床评估与计算机断层扫描诊断急性阑尾炎的前瞻性随机研究。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2003 Fall;4(3):231-9. doi: 10.1089/109629603322419562.
2
Comparison of CT and sonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a blinded prospective study.CT与超声检查在急性阑尾炎诊断中的比较:一项盲法前瞻性研究。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Nov;181(5):1355-9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.181.5.1811355.
3
Institutioning a clinical practice guideline to decrease the rate of normal appendectomies.制定一项临床实践指南以降低正常阑尾切除术的发生率。
Am Surg. 2003 Sep;69(9):796-8.
4
Effect of ultrasonography and optional computed tomography on the outcome of appendectomy.超声检查及选择性计算机断层扫描对阑尾切除术结局的影响。
Eur Radiol. 2003 Oct;13(10):2278-82. doi: 10.1007/s00330-003-1939-z. Epub 2003 Jul 5.
5
Liberal use of computed tomography scanning does not improve diagnostic accuracy in appendicitis.大量使用计算机断层扫描并不能提高阑尾炎的诊断准确性。
Am J Surg. 2003 Mar;185(3):194-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(02)01364-8.
6
Clinical practice. Suspected appendicitis.临床实践。疑似阑尾炎。
N Engl J Med. 2003 Jan 16;348(3):236-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp013351.
7
Appendicitis: should diagnostic imaging be performed if the clinical presentation is highly suggestive of the disease?阑尾炎:如果临床表现高度提示该病,是否应进行诊断性影像学检查?
Gastroenterology. 2002 Oct;123(4):992-8. doi: 10.1053/gast.2002.35956.
8
Managing acute appendicitis.急性阑尾炎的管理
BMJ. 2002 Sep 7;325(7363):505-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7363.505.
9
The clinical and economic correlates of misdiagnosed appendicitis: nationwide analysis.误诊阑尾炎的临床和经济关联:全国性分析
Arch Surg. 2002 Jul;137(7):799-804; discussion 804. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.137.7.799.
10
[Appendicitis in the last decade of the 20th century--Analysis of two prospective multicenter clinical observational studies].
Zentralbl Chir. 2002 Apr;127(4):290-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-31563.