Longobardi Teresa, Bernstein Charles N
University of Manitoba Inflammatory Bowel Disease Clinical and Research Centre and Department of Medicine, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006 Jun;4(6):731-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.02.013. Epub 2006 May 2.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The aim of this study was to quantify temporal changes in health care utilization by a population-based cohort of IBD.
By using the University of Manitoba IBD Epidemiology Database we assessed utilization of outpatient and hospital services, estimating relative risk (RR) of utilization for IBD cases compared with a matched cohort of non-IBD controls and for CD versus UC. We tested differences in utilization between prevalence cohorts 1990-1991 and 2000-2001. Also, utilization of the 1987-1988 incidence cohort was followed forward 15 years from diagnosis. The probability, intensity, and volume of utilization were estimated.
In 2000-2001, IBD patients compared with controls were more likely to have an outpatient visit (RR, 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-1.19) and an overnight hospital stay (RR, 2.32; 95% CI, 2.16-2.49). CD cases were more likely than UC cases to be hospitalized (RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.11-1.43) and had a greater number of outpatient visits. From 1990-1991 to 2000-2001, IBD cases experienced a significant decrease in the likelihood of an outpatient surgical visit relative to non-IBD controls (P < .05), and for those cases who were hospitalized, CD cases tended to be less likely than UC cases to experience IBD-specific inpatient surgery (P < .07). Of the 1987-1988 incidence cohort, 80% of admissions that occurred during the follow-up period were during the first 5 years after diagnosis.
In 2000-2001, health care utilization continued to be higher in IBD versus controls and CD versus UC; however, the gap in costly service utilization appeared to narrow between the latter pair.
本研究旨在量化以人群为基础的炎症性肠病(IBD)队列中医疗保健利用的时间变化。
通过使用曼尼托巴大学IBD流行病学数据库,我们评估了门诊和住院服务的利用情况,估计了IBD病例与匹配的非IBD对照队列相比以及克罗恩病(CD)与溃疡性结肠炎(UC)相比的利用相对风险(RR)。我们测试了1990 - 1991年患病率队列和2000 - 2001年患病率队列之间利用情况的差异。此外,对1987 - 1988年发病队列从诊断开始进行了15年的随访。估计了利用的概率、强度和量。
在2000 - 2001年,与对照组相比,IBD患者更有可能进行门诊就诊(RR,1.18;95%置信区间[CI],1.17 - 1.19)和过夜住院(RR,2.32;95% CI,2.16 - 2.49)。CD病例比UC病例更有可能住院(RR,1.26;95% CI,1.11 - 1.43),并且门诊就诊次数更多。从1990 - 1991年到2000 - 2001年,相对于非IBD对照,IBD病例进行门诊手术就诊的可能性显著降低(P < 0.05),对于那些住院的病例,CD病例比UC病例经历IBD特异性住院手术的可能性更小(P < 0.07)。在1987 - 1988年发病队列中,随访期间80%的入院发生在诊断后的前5年。
在2000 - 2001年,IBD患者的医疗保健利用率继续高于对照组,CD患者高于UC患者;然而,后两者之间在高成本服务利用方面的差距似乎在缩小。