Suppr超能文献

CIT概念在临床环境中的应用:障碍、实际情况及临床益处。

Application of the CIT concept in the clinical environment: hurdles, practicalities, and clinical benefits.

作者信息

Sterr Annette, Szameitat Andre, Shen Shan, Freivogel Susanna

机构信息

School of Human Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.

出版信息

Cogn Behav Neurol. 2006 Mar;19(1):48-54. doi: 10.1097/00146965-200603000-00006.

Abstract

Basic neuroscience research on brain plasticity, motor learning, and recovery has stimulated new concepts in motor rehabilitation. Combined with the development of methodological goal standards in clinical outcome research, these findings have effectuated the introduction of a double-paradigm shift in physical rehabilitation: (a) the move toward evidence-based procedures and disablement models for the assessment of clinical outcome and (b) the introduction of training-based concepts that are theoretically founded in learning theory. A major drive for new interventions has further come from recent findings on the adaptive capacities of neural networks and their linkage to perception, performance, and long-term recovery. In this context, constraint-induced movement therapy, an intervention initially designed for upper-limb hemiparesis, represents the theoretically and empirically most thoroughly founded training concept. Several clinical trials on constraint-induced therapy (CIT) have shown its efficacy in higher functioning patients; however, the transfer of the treatment into standard health care seems slow. Survey research further suggests a rather poor acceptance of CIT among clinical staff and it seems that the implementation of CIT is hindered by barriers constructed of beliefs and assumptions that demand a critical and evidence-based discussion. Within this context, we have conducted a series of experiments on amended CIT protocols and their application in the clinical environment which addressed the following issues: (1) massed practice: are 6 hours of daily training inevitable to achieve clinical benefits? (2) practicality: what is feasible in the standard care setting and what are the clinical benefits achieved by "feasible compromise CIT protocols?" (3) apprehensions: are concerns on increased muscular tone and pathologic movement patterns justified, and (4) learned nonuse: is the assumption of "hidden" residual abilities valid so that it warrants the constraint condition? In the present paper, the key findings of these studies will be summarized and critically discussed.

摘要

关于大脑可塑性、运动学习和恢复的基础神经科学研究激发了运动康复领域的新观念。这些研究结果与临床结局研究中方法学目标标准的发展相结合,在物理康复领域引发了双重范式转变:(a)朝着基于证据的程序和残疾模型转变,用于评估临床结局;(b)引入基于学习理论的训练概念。新干预措施的一个主要推动力还来自于最近关于神经网络的适应能力及其与感知、表现和长期恢复之间联系的研究发现。在这种背景下,约束诱导运动疗法最初是为上肢偏瘫设计的一种干预措施,代表了理论和实证基础最扎实的训练概念。多项关于约束诱导疗法(CIT)的临床试验表明,它对功能较高的患者有效;然而,将这种治疗方法应用于标准医疗保健的进程似乎较为缓慢。调查研究进一步表明,临床工作人员对CIT的接受程度相当低,而且CIT的实施似乎受到由信念和假设构成的障碍的阻碍,而这些信念和假设需要进行批判性的、基于证据的讨论。在此背景下,我们针对修订后的CIT方案及其在临床环境中的应用进行了一系列实验,这些实验解决了以下问题:(1)集中练习:每天6小时的训练对于获得临床益处是否必不可少?(2)实用性:在标准护理环境中可行的是什么,以及“可行的折衷CIT方案”能带来哪些临床益处?(3)担忧:对肌张力增加和病理运动模式的担忧是否合理,以及(4)习得性废用:“隐藏”的残余能力的假设是否成立,以至于需要施加约束条件?在本文中,将总结并批判性地讨论这些研究的关键发现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验