Daban Claire, Martínez-Arán Anabel, Torrent Carla, Sánchez-Moreno Jose, Goikolea Jose Manuel, Benabarre Antonio, Comes Merce, Colom Francesc, Vieta Eduard
Bipolar Disorders Program, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Spain.
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006 Apr;26(2):178-81. doi: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000204332.64390.f3.
Despite the increasing use of lamotrigine (LTG) in bipolar disorder, little is known about its impact on cognition in bipolar patients. Therefore, we have evaluated 33 bipolar I and II patients on cognitive measures (verbal memory, attention, executive functions) while receiving either LTG (n = 15) or another anticonvulsant (carbamazepine or valproate; n = 18). Patients receiving LTG were generally diagnosed as having bipolar II disorder, had experienced more depressive episodes but a lesser number of hospitalizations, and had better performance than the patients receiving carbamazepine or valproate on the verbal fluency task. A moderate effect size also suggests that both groups may differ on the immediate verbal memory test (California Verbal Learning Test). These preliminary results suggest a safer neurocognitive profile of LTG on bipolar patients, as compared with other anticonvulsants.
尽管拉莫三嗪(LTG)在双相情感障碍中的使用日益增加,但对于其对双相情感障碍患者认知功能的影响却知之甚少。因此,我们对33例双相I型和II型患者进行了认知测试(言语记忆、注意力、执行功能),这些患者分别接受LTG治疗(n = 15)或另一种抗惊厥药物(卡马西平或丙戊酸盐;n = 18)。接受LTG治疗的患者通常被诊断为双相II型障碍,经历过更多的抑郁发作,但住院次数较少,并且在言语流畅性任务上的表现优于接受卡马西平或丙戊酸盐治疗的患者。中等效应量也表明,两组在即时言语记忆测试(加利福尼亚言语学习测试)中可能存在差异。这些初步结果表明,与其他抗惊厥药物相比,LTG对双相情感障碍患者的神经认知状况更安全。