Bertolote José M
Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
World Psychiatry. 2004 Oct;3(3):147-51.
This paper reviews the prevention of suicide according to programme evaluation, risk and protective factors, type of intervention, level of intervention and the interface between clinical and public health levels. From nearly a century of experience, a few but important lessons have been learned: since suicide is affected by sociocultural factors, there is no safe indication that what has worked somewhere will work elsewhere; in order to acquire any public health importance, suicide prevention programmes must clearly spell out their objectives and targets; isolated actions have a much lesser probability of yielding significant population outcome results than more articulated approaches that integrate public health measures and individual care with appropriate follow-up and social support.
本文根据项目评估、风险和保护因素、干预类型、干预水平以及临床与公共卫生层面之间的衔接,对自杀预防进行了综述。从近一个世纪的经验中,我们得到了一些重要的教训:由于自杀受到社会文化因素的影响,没有可靠的迹象表明在某个地方有效的方法在其他地方也会有效;为了在公共卫生方面具有重要意义,自杀预防项目必须明确阐述其目标和对象;与将公共卫生措施、个体护理与适当的随访及社会支持相结合的更明确的方法相比,孤立的行动产生显著的总体结果的可能性要小得多。