Fontana P, Nolli S, Reber G, de Moerloose P
Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Division of Angiology and Hemostasis, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
J Thromb Haemost. 2006 Apr;4(4):813-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.01867.x.
Some data suggest that biological 'resistance' to aspirin or clopidogrel may influence clinical outcome.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between aspirin and clopidogrel responsiveness in healthy subjects.
Ninety-six healthy subjects were randomly assigned to receive a 1-week course of aspirin 100 mg day(-1) followed by a 1-week course of clopidogrel (300 mg on day 1, then 75 mg day(-1)), or the reverse sequence, separated by a 2-week wash-out period. The drug effects were assessed by means of serum TxB2 assay, platelet aggregation tests, and the PFA -100 and Ultegra RPFA -Verify Now methods.
Only one subject had true aspirin resistance, defined as a serum TxB2 level > 80 pg microL(-1) at the end of aspirin administration and confirmed by platelet incubation with aspirin. PFA-100 values were normal in 29% of the subjects after aspirin intake, despite a drastic reduction in TxB2 production; these subjects were considered to have aspirin pseudo-resistance. Clopidogrel responsiveness was not related to aspirin pseudo-resistance. Selected polymorphisms of platelet receptor genes were not associated with either aspirin or clopidogrel responsiveness.
In healthy subjects, true aspirin resistance is rare and aspirin pseudo-resistance is not related to clopidogrel responsiveness.
一些数据表明,对阿司匹林或氯吡格雷的生物学“抵抗”可能会影响临床结果。
本研究旨在评估健康受试者中阿司匹林和氯吡格雷反应性之间的关系。
96名健康受试者被随机分配接受为期1周的阿司匹林100毫克/天治疗,随后接受为期1周的氯吡格雷治疗(第1天300毫克,然后75毫克/天),或相反顺序,中间间隔2周的洗脱期。通过血清TXB2测定、血小板聚集试验以及PFA-100和Ultegra RPFA-Veri fy Now方法评估药物效果。
只有一名受试者存在真正的阿司匹林抵抗,定义为阿司匹林给药结束时血清TXB2水平>80皮克/微升,并通过血小板与阿司匹林孵育得到证实。尽管TXB2生成大幅减少,但阿司匹林摄入后29%的受试者PFA-100值正常;这些受试者被认为存在阿司匹林假性抵抗。氯吡格雷反应性与阿司匹林假性抵抗无关。血小板受体基因的选定多态性与阿司匹林或氯吡格雷反应性均无关联。
在健康受试者中,真正的阿司匹林抵抗很少见,且阿司匹林假性抵抗与氯吡格雷反应性无关。