Stroke Trials Unit, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Stroke Division, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2021 Mar;6(1):103-108. doi: 10.1136/svn-2020-000346. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
Antiplatelet agents reduce recurrence after cerebral ischaemia but are not effective in all patients, in part because of treatment resistance. The primary aim was to assess the proportion of patients who are insensitive to clopidogrel. The secondary aim was to assess the association between insensitivity to clopidogrel and recurrent cerebrovascular events.
Following written informed consent, independent patients with a recent non-cardioembolic ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack, and taking clopidogrel, were enrolled. Platelet function was assessed with remote measurement of surface expression of P-selectin (CD62P) using commercial kits sensitive to aspirin or clopidogrel. Participants' general practitioners provided details on recurrent vascular events at least 90 days later. Data are mean (SD) and median [IQR]. Resistance was defined as: aspirin median fluorescence (MF) >500 units, clopidogrel MF >860 units. Non-parametric descriptors and tests were used.
63 patients were recruited: mean age 64 (13.7) years, women 47%. At baseline, 59 (95%) patients were taking clopidogrel alone with 3 (5%) on combined clopidogrel and aspirin. Assessment of platelet surface P-selectin revealed: aspirin test 528 [317, 834], >500 54.8%; clopidogrel test 429 [303, 656], >860 11.3%. No participants on aspirin and clopidogrel showed aspirin resistance. Thirteen (20.6%) patients had a recurrent cerebrovascular event; those with an ischaemic stroke had a non-significantly higher baseline P-selectin using the clopidogrel test as compared with those with no recurrence: 626 [380, 801] versus 406 [265, 609], p=0.08.
Remote measurement of platelet function assessed using the platelet surface expression of P-selectin is feasible. 11% of patients taking clopidogrel showed resistance. No significant associations were noted between clopidogrel resistance and recurrent ischaemic events.
抗血小板药物可降低脑缺血后的复发率,但并非对所有患者都有效,部分原因是治疗耐药。主要目的是评估对氯吡格雷不敏感的患者比例。次要目的是评估对氯吡格雷不敏感与复发性脑血管事件之间的关系。
经书面知情同意,入选近期发生非心源性缺血性卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作且正在服用氯吡格雷的独立患者。使用商业试剂盒通过远程测量血小板表面 P-选择素(CD62P)的表达来评估血小板功能,该试剂盒对阿司匹林或氯吡格雷敏感。患者的全科医生在至少 90 天后提供复发性血管事件的详细信息。数据为平均值(标准差)和中位数[四分位数范围]。耐药定义为:阿司匹林中位荧光强度(MF)>500 单位,氯吡格雷 MF >860 单位。使用非参数描述符和检验。
共纳入 63 例患者:平均年龄 64(13.7)岁,女性 47%。基线时,59(95%)例患者单独服用氯吡格雷,3(5%)例患者联合服用氯吡格雷和阿司匹林。评估血小板表面 P-选择素显示:阿司匹林试验 528[317,834],>500 54.8%;氯吡格雷试验 429[303,656],>860 11.3%。服用阿司匹林和氯吡格雷的患者均未出现阿司匹林耐药。13(20.6%)例患者发生复发性脑血管事件;与无复发者相比,发生缺血性卒中的患者氯吡格雷试验的基线 P-选择素更高:626[380,801]比 406[265,609],p=0.08。
使用血小板表面 P-选择素表达的远程血小板功能测量是可行的。11%服用氯吡格雷的患者存在耐药。氯吡格雷耐药与复发性缺血性事件之间未见显著相关性。