Van Strydonck D A C, Timmerman M F, Van der Velden U, Van der Weijden G A
Department of Periodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, ACTA, Louwesweg, EA Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Clin Periodontol. 2006 May;33(5):340-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.00910.x.
The aim of the present study was to compare the plaque-inhibitory effect of a 0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) rinse when preceded by ordinary toothbrushing with a 1.5% sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS)-containing dentifrice to the effect of the same rinse when used alone, or when preceded by rinsing with an SLS-containing slurry.
The study was an examiner blinded, randomized three-arm, parallel design. It used a 4-day plaque accumulation model to compare three different oral hygiene regimens, which were performed under supervision. One hundred and twenty healthy volunteers were enrolled in the study and were randomly assigned to one of each group. At the beginning of each test period, they received a thorough dental prophylaxis. The experiment was performed in one randomly assigned (upper or lower) jaw, called the study jaw. The opposite jaw, referred to as the dentifrice jaw, served only to introduce the influence of toothbrushing with a dentifrice on the anti-plaque efficacy of the CHX in the study jaw of the same mouth. At the end of the 4-day test period, plaque and gingival bleeding were scored in the study jaw. In all the regimens, the oral hygiene procedure was finalized by rinsing with a CHX 0.2% solution for 1 min. The study jaw was not brushed during the experiment. Regimen A (positive control) consisted of rinsing with CHX alone. In regimen B, rinsing with CHX was preceded by rinsing with an SLS-containing slurry, while in regimen C rinsing with CHX was preceded by toothbrushing with an SLS-containing dentifrice in the dentifrice jaw. No other oral hygiene measures were allowed. After 4 days of undisturbed plaque accumulation, the amount of plaque and level of gingival health were evaluated.
The overall plaque index for regimens A, B and C was 1.17, 1.62, and 1.14, respectively. There was no significant difference in plaque accumulation between the CHX alone regimen (A) and the SLS-dentifrice-CHX regimen (C). Regimen B differed significantly from regimens A and C. The overall bleeding index for regimens A, B and C was 0.24, 0.18, and 0.20, respectively. There was no significant difference between the three regimens.
The present study shows that the anti-plaque efficacy of a 0.2% CHX rinse was not reduced when preceded by everyday toothbrushing with a SLS-containing dentifrice. However, when preceded by rinsing with an SLS-containing slurry, the anti-plaque efficacy of a 0.2% CHX rinse was reduced.
本研究旨在比较在使用含1.5%月桂醇硫酸酯钠(SLS)的牙膏进行普通刷牙后再使用0.2%葡萄糖酸氯己定(CHX)漱口水的防菌斑效果,与单独使用该漱口水或在使用含SLS的糊剂漱口后再使用该漱口水的效果进行对比。
本研究采用检查者盲法、随机三臂平行设计。使用4天菌斑积聚模型来比较三种不同的口腔卫生方案,这些方案在监督下进行。120名健康志愿者参与研究并被随机分配到每组。在每个测试期开始时,他们接受了全面的牙齿洁治。实验在随机分配的一侧(上颚或下颚)进行,称为研究侧。另一侧称为牙膏侧,仅用于引入使用含牙膏刷牙对同口腔研究侧CHX防菌斑效果的影响。在4天测试期结束时,对研究侧的菌斑和牙龈出血情况进行评分。在所有方案中,口腔卫生程序以用0.2% CHX溶液漱口1分钟结束。实验期间研究侧不刷牙。方案A(阳性对照)为单独用CHX漱口。在方案B中,用含SLS的糊剂漱口后再用CHX漱口,而在方案C中,在牙膏侧用含SLS的牙膏刷牙后再用CHX漱口。不允许采取其他口腔卫生措施。在4天不受干扰的菌斑积聚后,评估菌斑量和牙龈健康水平。
方案A、B和C的总体菌斑指数分别为1.17、1.62和1.14。单独使用CHX方案(A)和含SLS牙膏-CHX方案(C)之间的菌斑积聚无显著差异。方案B与方案A和C有显著差异。方案A、B和C的总体出血指数分别为0.24、0.18和0.20。三种方案之间无显著差异。
本研究表明,在使用含SLS的牙膏进行日常刷牙后再使用0.2% CHX漱口水,其防菌斑效果并未降低。然而,在用含SLS的糊剂漱口后再使用0.2% CHX漱口水,其防菌斑效果会降低。