Dabney Alan R, Storey John D
Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Biostatistics. 2007 Jan;8(1):128-39. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxj038. Epub 2006 Apr 24.
A two-channel microarray measures the relative expression levels of thousands of genes from a pair of biological samples. In order to reliably compare gene expression levels between and within arrays, it is necessary to remove systematic errors that distort the biological signal of interest. The standard for accomplishing this is smoothing "MA-plots" to remove intensity-dependent dye bias and array-specific effects. However, MA methods require strong assumptions, which limit their general applicability. We review these assumptions and derive several practical scenarios in which they fail. The "dye-swap" normalization method has been much less frequently used because it requires two arrays per pair of samples. We show that a dye-swap is accurate under general assumptions, even under intensity-dependent dye bias, and that a dye-swap removes dye bias from a single pair of samples in general. Based on a flexible model of the relationship between mRNA amount and single-channel fluorescence intensity, we demonstrate the general applicability of a dye-swap approach. We then propose a common array dye-swap (CADS) method for the normalization of two-channel microarrays. We show that CADS removes both dye bias and array-specific effects, and preserves the true differential expression signal for every gene under the assumptions of the model.
双通道微阵列可测量来自一对生物样品的数千个基因的相对表达水平。为了可靠地比较不同阵列之间以及同一阵列内的基因表达水平,有必要消除那些会扭曲目标生物信号的系统误差。实现这一目标的标准做法是对“MA图”进行平滑处理,以消除强度依赖性染料偏差和阵列特异性效应。然而,MA方法需要很强的假设条件,这限制了它们的普遍适用性。我们审视了这些假设条件,并推导了几种它们不成立的实际情形。“染料交换”归一化方法的使用频率要低得多,因为每对样品需要两个阵列。我们证明,即使在存在强度依赖性染料偏差的情况下,染料交换在一般假设下也是准确的,而且通常能从单对样品中消除染料偏差。基于mRNA量与单通道荧光强度之间关系的灵活模型,我们证明了染料交换方法的普遍适用性。然后,我们提出了一种用于双通道微阵列归一化的通用阵列染料交换(CADS)方法。我们表明,CADS既能消除染料偏差,又能消除阵列特异性效应,并且在模型假设下能保留每个基因的真实差异表达信号。