Suppr超能文献

羟考酮用于癌症相关疼痛:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

Oxycodone for cancer-related pain: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Reid Colette M, Martin Richard M, Sterne Jonathan A C, Davies Andrew N, Hanks Geoffrey W

机构信息

Department of Palliative Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, England.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 2006 Apr 24;166(8):837-43. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.8.837.

Abstract

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of oxycodone in cancer-related pain, we conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Four studies, comparing oral oxycodone with either oral morphine (n = 3) or oral hydromorphone (n = 1), were suitable for meta-analysis. Standardized mean differences in pain scores comparing oxycodone with control groups were pooled using random-effects models. Overall, there was no evidence that mean pain scores differed between oxycodone and control drugs (pooled standardized mean difference, 0.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.29 to 0.36; P = .8; I(2) = 62%). In meta-regression analyses, pain scores were higher for oxycodone compared with morphine (0.20; 95% CI, -0.04 to 0.44) and lower compared with hydromorphone (-0.36; 95% CI, -0.71 to 0.00), although these effect sizes were small. The efficacy and tolerability of oxycodone are similar to morphine, supporting its use as an opioid for cancer-related pain.

摘要

为评估羟考酮治疗癌痛的疗效和耐受性,我们对随机对照试验进行了系统评价。四项比较口服羟考酮与口服吗啡(n = 3)或口服氢吗啡酮(n = 1)的研究适合进行荟萃分析。使用随机效应模型汇总了羟考酮与对照组疼痛评分的标准化均值差异。总体而言,没有证据表明羟考酮与对照药物之间的平均疼痛评分存在差异(汇总标准化均值差异为0.04;95%置信区间[CI]为-0.29至0.36;P = 0.8;I² = 62%)。在荟萃回归分析中,与吗啡相比,羟考酮的疼痛评分更高(0.20;95% CI为-0.04至0.44),与氢吗啡酮相比更低(-0.36;95% CI为-0.71至0.00),尽管这些效应量较小。羟考酮的疗效和耐受性与吗啡相似,支持其作为治疗癌痛的阿片类药物使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验