Suppr超能文献

盆底肌训练、肌电图生物反馈和神经肌肉电刺激对多发性硬化症患者膀胱功能障碍的比较:一项随机试验研究

Comparison of pelvic floor muscle training, electromyography biofeedback, and neuromuscular electrical stimulation for bladder dysfunction in people with multiple sclerosis: a randomized pilot study.

作者信息

McClurg D, Ashe R G, Marshall K, Lowe-Strong A S

机构信息

Health and Rehabilitation Sciences Research Institute, University of Ulster, Newtownabbey, Northern Ireland.

出版信息

Neurourol Urodyn. 2006;25(4):337-48. doi: 10.1002/nau.20209.

Abstract

AIM

Bladder dysfunction affects up to 90% of the multiple sclerosis (MS) population. Interventions such as Pelvic Floor Training and Advice (PFTA), Electromyography (EMG) Biofeedback, and Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) have received limited research attention within this population. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of a combined programme of PFTA, EMG Biofeedback, and NMES for bladder dysfunction in MS.

METHODS

Females (n = 30) who fulfilled strict inclusion/exclusion criteria were recruited. Outcome measures (weeks 0, 9, 16, and 24) included: 3-day Voiding Diary; 24 hr Pad-Test; Uroflowmetry; Pelvic Floor Muscle Assessment; Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ); Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI); King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ), and the Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54 Instrument (MSQoL-54). Following baseline (week 0) assessment, participants were randomly allocated, under double blind conditions, to one of the three groups: Group 1 (PFTA); Group 2 (PFTA and EMG Biofeedback); and Group 3 (PFTA, EMG Biofeedback, and NMES). Treatment was for 9 weeks.

RESULTS

Baseline severity (measured by number of leaks and pad weight) showed some variation between groups, although not statistically significant (P > 0.05); with the caveat that this baseline imbalance makes interpretation difficult, a picture emerges that at week 9, Group 3 demonstrated superior benefit as measured by the number of leaks and pad test than Group 2, with Group 1 showing less improvement when compared to week 0; this was statistically significant between Groups 1 and 3 for number of leaks (P = 0.014) and pad tests (P = 0.001), and Groups 1 and 2 for pad tests (P = 0.001). A similar pattern was evident for all other outcome measures.

CONCLUSION

Results suggest that these treatments, used in combination, may reduce urinary symptoms in MS. Further research will establish the effectiveness of these interventions.

摘要

目的

膀胱功能障碍影响多达90%的多发性硬化症(MS)患者。诸如盆底训练与建议(PFTA)、肌电图(EMG)生物反馈以及神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)等干预措施在该人群中受到的研究关注有限。本研究旨在确定PFTA、EMG生物反馈和NMES联合方案对MS患者膀胱功能障碍的有效性。

方法

招募了符合严格纳入/排除标准的女性(n = 30)。结局指标(第0、9、16和24周)包括:3天排尿日记;24小时护垫试验;尿流率测定;盆底肌肉评估;尿失禁影响问卷(IIQ);泌尿生殖系统困扰量表(UDI);国王健康问卷(KHQ)以及多发性硬化症生活质量-54量表(MSQoL-54)。在基线(第0周)评估后,参与者在双盲条件下被随机分配到三组中的一组:第1组(PFTA);第2组(PFTA和EMG生物反馈);第3组(PFTA、EMG生物反馈和NMES)。治疗为期9周。

结果

尽管各组之间基线严重程度(通过漏尿次数和护垫重量衡量)存在一定差异,但无统计学意义(P > 0.05);需要注意的是,这种基线不平衡使得解释变得困难,不过仍可看出,在第9周时,就漏尿次数和护垫试验而言,第3组显示出比第2组更显著的益处,与第0周相比,第1组改善较少;在漏尿次数方面,第1组和第3组之间具有统计学意义(P = 0.014),护垫试验方面,第1组和第3组之间(P = 0.001)以及第1组和第2组之间(P = 0.001)均具有统计学意义。所有其他结局指标也呈现出类似模式。

结论

结果表明,这些治疗方法联合使用可能会减轻MS患者的泌尿症状。进一步的研究将确定这些干预措施的有效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验