La Torre A, Leandri A, Lolletti D
CRA-Plant Pathology Research Institute via C.G. Bertero 22, I-00156 Roma, Italy.
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2005;70(3):351-63.
This paper reports the results of two trials carried out to estimate the hygienic-sanitary status of samples obtained from organic farming in comparison with products obtained from conventional agriculture. In three years of activity were carried out analyses on samples of common or durum wheat and on processing products like. flour, bran, macaroni and bread obtained from biological and conventional method. Also samples of vegetables and fruits were analyzed. The laboratory analyses have been focalized on qualitative and quantitative evaluation of fungal contamination and surveying of pesticide residues level. The great size of collected data has not highlighted substantial differences between the two analyzed typologies. About pesticide residues levels, generally they proved to be contained under the Italian legal limit, so both these products can be considered healthy under a hygienic-sanitary profile. The trials should be extended also to other cultivations like herbs, fruit-trees and vegetables to improve our knowledge's about qualitative and hygienic differences beyond the two methods of production and defense.
本文报告了两项试验的结果，这两项试验旨在评估从有机农业获得的样品与从传统农业获得的产品相比的卫生状况。在三年的活动中，对普通小麦或硬粒小麦样品以及从生物和传统方法获得的加工产品（如面粉、麸皮、通心粉和面包）进行了分析。还对蔬菜和水果样品进行了分析。实验室分析集中在真菌污染的定性和定量评估以及农药残留水平的检测上。大量收集的数据并未突出两种分析类型之间的实质性差异。关于农药残留水平，一般来说它们被证明低于意大利法定限量，因此从卫生角度来看，这两种产品都可以被认为是健康的。这些试验还应扩展到其他作物，如草药、果树和蔬菜，以增进我们对这两种生产和防护方法之外的质量和卫生差异的了解。
