Haslberger Alexander G
Vienna Ecology Center, Department for Nutritional Sciences, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 2, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
J Agric Food Chem. 2006 May 3;54(9):3173-80. doi: 10.1021/jf0511650.
Evidence for substantial environmental influences on health and food safety comes from work with environmental health indicators which show that agroenvironmental practices have direct and indirect effects on human health, concluding that "the quality of the environment influences the quality and safety of foods" [Fennema, O. Environ. Health Perspect. 1990, 86, 229-232). In the field of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), Codex principles have been established for the assessment of GM food safety and the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety outlines international principles for an environmental assessment of living modified organisms. Both concepts also contain starting points for an assessment of health/food safety effects of GMOs in cases when the environment is involved in the chain of events that could lead to hazards. The environment can act as a route of unintentional entry of GMOs into the food supply, such as in the case of gene flow via pollen or seeds from GM crops, but the environment can also be involved in changes of GMO-induced agricultural practices with relevance for health/food safety. Examples for this include potential regional changes of pesticide uses and reduction in pesticide poisonings resulting from the use of Bt crops or influences on immune responses via cross-reactivity. Clearly, modern methods of biotechnology in breeding are involved in the reasons behind the rapid reduction of local varieties in agrodiversity, which constitute an identified hazard for food safety and food security. The health/food safety assessment of GM foods in cases when the environment is involved needs to be informed by data from environmental assessment. Such data might be especially important for hazard identification and exposure assessment. International organizations working in these areas will very likely be needed to initiate and enable cooperation between those institutions responsible for the different assessments, as well as for exchange and analysis of information. An integrated assessment might help to focus and save capacities in highly technical areas such as molecular characterization or profiling, which are often necessary for both assessments. In the area of establishing international standards for traded foods, such as for the newly created Standards in Trade and Development Facility (STDF), an integrated assessment might help in the consideration of important environmental aspects involved in health and food safety. Furthermore, an established integrated view on GMOs may create greater consumer confidence in the technology.
大量证据表明环境对健康和食品安全有重大影响,这些证据来自于环境卫生指标相关工作,这些指标显示农业环境实践对人类健康有直接和间接影响,得出“环境质量影响食品质量和安全”的结论[芬内马,O.《环境健康展望》1990年,第86卷,第229 - 232页]。在转基因生物(GMOs)领域,食品法典委员会已制定转基因食品安全评估原则,《卡塔赫纳生物安全议定书》概述了对转基因生物进行环境评估的国际原则。当环境参与到可能导致危害的事件链中时,这两个概念也都包含了评估转基因生物对健康/食品安全影响的切入点。环境可以成为转基因生物无意进入食品供应的途径,例如通过转基因作物的花粉或种子进行基因流动的情况,但环境也可能涉及与健康/食品安全相关的转基因生物诱导的农业实践变化。这方面的例子包括使用Bt作物导致农药使用的潜在区域变化以及农药中毒减少,或通过交叉反应对免疫反应的影响。显然,现代生物技术育种方法是农业生物多样性中地方品种迅速减少背后的原因之一,而地方品种的减少已被确定为食品安全和粮食安全的一个危害。当环境涉及其中时,转基因食品的健康/食品安全评估需要依据环境评估数据。这些数据对于危害识别和暴露评估可能尤为重要。在这些领域开展工作的国际组织很可能需要发起并促成负责不同评估的机构之间的合作,以及信息的交流和分析。综合评估可能有助于集中并节省在分子特征分析或谱分析等高技术领域的能力,而这些领域对于两种评估往往都是必要的。在为贸易食品制定国际标准的领域,例如新设立的贸易与发展设施标准(STDF),综合评估可能有助于考虑健康和食品安全中涉及的重要环境方面。此外,对转基因生物形成既定的综合观点可能会增强消费者对该技术的信心。