Bellaloui Nacer, Reddy Krishna N, Zablotowicz Robert M, Mengistu Alemu
Crop Genetics and Production Research Unit, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Stoneville, Mississippi 38776, USA.
J Agric Food Chem. 2006 May 3;54(9):3357-64. doi: 10.1021/jf053198l.
Nontarget injury from glyphosate drift is a concern among growers using non-glyphosate-resistant (non-GR) cultivars. The effects of glyphosate drift on nitrate assimilation and nitrogen fixation potential, nodule mass, and yield of non-GR soybean were assessed in a field trial at Stoneville, MS. A non-GR soybean cultivar 'Delta Pine 4748S' was treated with glyphosate at 12.5% of use rate of 0.84 kg of active ingredient/ha at 3 (V2), 6 (V7), and 8 (R2, full bloom) weeks after planting (WAP) soybean to simulate glyphosate drift. Untreated soybean was used as a control. Soybeans were sampled weekly for 2 weeks after each glyphosate treatment to assess nitrate assimilation and N2 fixation potential. Nitrate assimilation was assessed using in vivo nitrate reductase assay in leaves, stems, roots, and nodules. Nitrogen fixation potential was assessed by measuring nitrogenase activity using the acetylene reduction assay (ARA). Nitrogen content of leaves, shoots, and seed and soybean yield were also determined. In the first sampling date (4 WAP), glyphosate drift caused a significant decrease in NRA in leaves (60%), stems (77%), and nodules (50%), with no decrease in roots. At later growth stages, NRA in leaves was more sensitive to glyphosate drift than stems and roots. Nitrogenase activity was reduced 36-58% by glyphosate treatment at 3 or 6 WAP. However, glyphosate treatment at 8 WAP had no effect on nitrogenase activity. Nitrogen content was affected by glyphosate application only in shoots after the first application. No yield, seed nitrogen, protein, or oil concentration differences were detected. These results suggest that nitrate assimilation and nitrogen fixation potential were significantly reduced by glyphosate drift, with the greatest sensitivity early in vegetative growth. Soybean has the ability to recover from the physiological stress caused by glyphosate drift.
草甘膦漂移造成的非靶标损伤是使用非抗草甘膦(non-GR)品种的种植者所关心的问题。在密西西比州斯通维尔的一项田间试验中,评估了草甘膦漂移对非抗草甘膦大豆的硝酸盐同化、固氮潜力、根瘤质量和产量的影响。用草甘膦以0.84千克活性成分/公顷使用量的12.5%对非抗草甘膦大豆品种“三角洲松树4748S”在种植大豆后的3周(V2)、6周(V7)和8周(R2,盛花期)进行处理,以模拟草甘膦漂移。未处理的大豆用作对照。在每次草甘膦处理后每周对大豆进行采样,持续2周,以评估硝酸盐同化和固氮潜力。使用体内硝酸盐还原酶测定法评估叶片、茎、根和根瘤中的硝酸盐同化。通过使用乙炔还原测定法(ARA)测量固氮酶活性来评估固氮潜力。还测定了叶片、地上部和种子的氮含量以及大豆产量。在第一个采样日期(种植后4周),草甘膦漂移导致叶片(60%)、茎(77%)和根瘤(50%)中的硝酸还原酶活性显著降低,而根中没有降低。在后期生长阶段,叶片中的硝酸还原酶活性比茎和根对草甘膦漂移更敏感。在3周或6周时用草甘膦处理使固氮酶活性降低了36 - 58%。然而,在第8周时用草甘膦处理对固氮酶活性没有影响。仅在首次施用后,地上部的氮含量受草甘膦施用的影响。未检测到产量、种子氮、蛋白质或油浓度的差异。这些结果表明,草甘膦漂移显著降低了硝酸盐同化和固氮潜力,在营养生长早期敏感性最高。大豆有能力从草甘膦漂移引起的生理胁迫中恢复。