Nandula Vijay K, Reddy Krishna N, Rimando Agnes M, Duke Stephen O, Poston Daniel H
Delta Research and Extension Center, Mississippi State University, P.O. Box 197, Stoneville, Mississippi 38776, USA.
J Agric Food Chem. 2007 May 2;55(9):3540-5. doi: 10.1021/jf063568l. Epub 2007 Apr 7.
Experiments were conducted to determine (1) dose response of glyphosate-resistant (GR) and -susceptible (non-GR) soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] and canola (Brassica napus L.) to glyphosate, (2) if differential metabolism of glyphosate to aminomethyl phosphonic acid (AMPA) is the underlying mechanism for differential resistance to glyphosate among GR soybean varieties, and (3) the extent of metabolism of glyphosate to AMPA in GR canola and to correlate metabolism to injury from AMPA. GR50 (glyphosate dose required to cause a 50% reduction in plant dry weight) values for GR (Asgrow 4603RR) and non-GR (HBKC 5025) soybean were 22.8 kg ae ha-1 and 0.47 kg ha-1, respectively, with GR soybean exhibiting a 49-fold level of resistance to glyphosate as compared to non-GR soybean. Differential reduction in chlorophyll by glyphosate was observed between GR soybean varieties, but there were no differences in shoot fresh weight reduction. No significant differences were found between GR varieties in metabolism of glyphosate to AMPA, and in shikimate levels. These results indicate that GR soybean varieties were able to outgrow the initial injury from glyphosate, which was previously caused at least in part by AMPA. GR50 values for GR (Hyola 514RR) and non-GR (Hyola 440) canola were 14.1 and 0.30 kg ha-1, respectively, with GR canola exhibiting a 47-fold level of resistance to glyphosate when compared to non-GR canola. Glyphosate did not cause reduction in chlorophyll content and shoot fresh weight in GR canola, unlike GR soybean. Less glyphosate (per unit leaf weight) was recovered in glyphosate-treated GR canola as compared to glyphosate-treated GR soybean. External application of AMPA caused similar injury in both GR and non-GR canola. The presence of a bacterial glyphosate oxidoreductase gene in GR canola contributes to breakdown of glyphosate to AMPA. However, the AMPA from glyphosate breakdown could have been metabolized to nonphytotoxic metabolites before causing injury to GR canola. Injury in GR and non-GR canola from exogenous application of AMPA was similar.
进行了多项实验,以确定:(1) 抗草甘膦(GR)和对草甘膦敏感(非GR)的大豆 [大豆(Glycine max (L.) Merr.)] 和油菜(甘蓝型油菜(Brassica napus L.))对草甘膦的剂量反应;(2) 草甘膦向氨甲基膦酸(AMPA)的差异代谢是否是GR大豆品种对草甘膦产生差异抗性的潜在机制;(3) GR油菜中草甘膦向AMPA的代谢程度以及将代谢与AMPA造成的伤害相关联。GR(Asgrow 4603RR)和非GR(HBKC 5025)大豆的GR50(导致植物干重降低50%所需的草甘膦剂量)值分别为22.8千克酸等效物/公顷和0.47千克/公顷,与非GR大豆相比,GR大豆对草甘膦的抗性水平高49倍。在GR大豆品种之间观察到草甘膦对叶绿素的降低存在差异,但地上部鲜重降低没有差异。在草甘膦向AMPA的代谢以及莽草酸水平方面,GR品种之间未发现显著差异。这些结果表明,GR大豆品种能够从草甘膦造成的初始伤害中恢复生长,而这种伤害之前至少部分是由AMPA引起的。GR(Hyola 514RR)和非GR(Hyola 440)油菜的GR50值分别为14.1和0.30千克/公顷,与非GR油菜相比,GR油菜对草甘膦的抗性水平高47倍。与GR大豆不同,草甘膦不会导致GR油菜的叶绿素含量和地上部鲜重降低。与用草甘膦处理的GR大豆相比,在经草甘膦处理的GR油菜中回收的草甘膦(每单位叶重)较少。在GR和非GR油菜中外源施用AMPA会造成类似的伤害。GR油菜中细菌草甘膦氧化还原酶基因的存在有助于将草甘膦分解为AMPA。然而,草甘膦分解产生的AMPA在对GR油菜造成伤害之前可能已被代谢为无植物毒性的代谢物。外源施用AMPA对GR和非GR油菜造成的伤害相似。