Godoy-Bezerra Juliana, Vieira Sérgio, Oliveira José Henrique Gonzaga, Lara Flávio
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Universidade de Pernambuco, Av. Boa Viagem, 1998/101, Recife, PE 512 111 000, Brazil.
Angle Orthod. 2006 May;76(3):470-4. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0470:SBSORG]2.0.CO;2.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement in a saliva-contaminated environment, using different enamel pretreatments. A total of 125 freshly extracted, bovine permanent inferior incisors were divided into five groups. Group I received 10% polyacrylic acid, moistened with saliva/Fuji Ortho LC (FOLC); group II received 37% phosphoric acid, moistened with saliva/FOLC; group III was moistened with saliva/ FOLC, without acid etching; group IV received 10% polyacrylic acid, not moistened with saliva/ FOLC; and group V was used as a control with 37% phosphoric acid/dry/Transbond XT. After the bonding procedures, all samples were thermocycled, tested in a shear mode on a testing machine, and the Adhesive Remnant Index was evaluated. One-way analysis of variance and Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) tests indicated that group V yielded the highest shear bond strength (4.09 MPa) but with no statistically significant difference from group II (3.88 MPa). There were no statistically significant differences between groups I, III, and IV (2.84, 2.90, and 3.22 MPa, respectively) (P > or = .05). In groups I, II, IV, and V, where enamel was etched, more than 50% of the samples showed that all material adhered to the teeth surfaces. This was opposed to group III, where the bond failure was mostly between the enamel interface and the bonding material. The results indicated that in a saliva-moistened environment, FOLC achieved higher shear bond strength when 37% phosphoric acid is used, with no statistically significant difference from Transbond XT.
本研究的目的是使用不同的釉质预处理方法,评估在唾液污染环境中树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀的剪切粘结强度。总共125颗新鲜拔除的牛恒下颌切牙被分为五组。第一组接受10%聚丙烯酸处理,用唾液湿润/富士正畸LC(FOLC);第二组接受37%磷酸处理,用唾液湿润/FOLC;第三组用唾液湿润/FOLC,不进行酸蚀;第四组接受10%聚丙烯酸处理,不用唾液湿润/FOLC;第五组作为对照组,使用37%磷酸/干燥/Transbond XT。粘结程序完成后,所有样本进行热循环处理,在测试机上以剪切模式进行测试,并评估粘结剂残留指数。单因素方差分析和Tukey真实显著差异(HSD)检验表明,第五组产生的剪切粘结强度最高(4.09MPa),但与第二组(3.88MPa)无统计学显著差异。第一组、第三组和第四组之间无统计学显著差异(分别为2.84、2.90和3.22MPa)(P≥0.05)。在进行釉质酸蚀的第一组、第二组、第四组和第五组中,超过50%的样本显示所有材料均粘结在牙齿表面。这与第三组相反,第三组的粘结失败大多发生在釉质界面和粘结材料之间。结果表明,在唾液湿润的环境中,当使用37%磷酸时,FOLC可获得较高的剪切粘结强度,与Transbond XT无统计学显著差异。