• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

面部的侧翼效应可能取决于感知差异以及情感差异。

Flanker effects with faces may depend on perceptual as well as emotional differences.

作者信息

Horstmann Gernot, Borgstedt Kirsten, Heumann Manfred

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.

出版信息

Emotion. 2006 Feb;6(1):28-39. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.6.1.28.

DOI:10.1037/1528-3542.6.1.28
PMID:16637748
Abstract

Do threatening or negative faces capture attention? The authors argue that evidence from visual search, spatial cuing, and flanker tasks is equivocal and that perceptual differences may account for effects attributed to emotional categories. Empirically, the authors examine the flanker task. Although they replicate previous results in which a positive face flanked by negative faces suffers more interference than a negative face flanked by positive faces, further results indicate that face perception is not necessary for the flanker-effect asymmetry and that the asymmetry also occurs with nonemotional stimuli. The authors conclude that the flanker-effect asymmetry with affective faces cannot be unambiguously attributed to emotional differences and may well be due to purely perceptual differences between the stimuli.

摘要

具有威胁性或负面的面孔会吸引注意力吗?作者认为,来自视觉搜索、空间线索提示和侧翼任务的证据并不明确,感知差异可能是导致情感类别效应的原因。从实证角度来看,作者对侧翼任务进行了研究。尽管他们重复了之前的研究结果,即被负面面孔包围的正面面孔比被正面面孔包围的负面面孔受到的干扰更大,但进一步的结果表明,面孔感知对于侧翼效应的不对称性并非必要条件,而且这种不对称性在非情感刺激中也会出现。作者得出结论,情感面孔的侧翼效应不对称性不能明确归因于情感差异,很可能是由于刺激之间纯粹的感知差异所致。

相似文献

1
Flanker effects with faces may depend on perceptual as well as emotional differences.面部的侧翼效应可能取决于感知差异以及情感差异。
Emotion. 2006 Feb;6(1):28-39. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.6.1.28.
2
Search asymmetries with real faces: testing the anger-superiority effect.真实面孔的搜索不对称性:检验愤怒优势效应。
Emotion. 2006 May;6(2):193-207. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.6.2.193.
3
No effect of inversion on attentional and affective processing of facial expressions.倒置对面部表情的注意力和情感加工没有影响。
Emotion. 2009 Apr;9(2):248-59. doi: 10.1037/a0014715.
4
Modulation of focused attention by faces expressing emotion: evidence from flanker tasks.表达情感的面孔对注意力聚焦的调节作用:来自侧翼任务的证据。
Emotion. 2003 Dec;3(4):327-43. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.3.4.327.
5
The face in the crowd effect: anger superiority when using real faces and multiple identities.人群中的面孔效应:使用真实面孔和多个身份时的愤怒优势。
Emotion. 2010 Feb;10(1):141-6. doi: 10.1037/a0017387.
6
Visual marking and facial affect: can an emotional face be ignored?视觉标记与面部情绪:情绪面孔能否被忽视?
Emotion. 2010 Apr;10(2):147-68. doi: 10.1037/a0017743.
7
A threat-detection advantage in those with autism spectrum disorders.自闭症谱系障碍患者的威胁检测优势。
Brain Cogn. 2009 Apr;69(3):472-80. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.10.002. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
8
Impaired emotional facial expression recognition in alcoholics: are these deficits specific to emotional cues?酗酒者面部表情识别能力受损:这些缺陷是否特定于情感线索?
Psychiatry Res. 2007 Feb 28;150(1):33-41. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2005.12.008. Epub 2007 Jan 30.
9
Attentional capture by emotional faces is contingent on attentional control settings.情绪面孔的注意捕获取决于注意控制设置。
Cogn Emot. 2012;26(7):1223-37. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2011.645279. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
10
Attentional bias to angry faces using the dot-probe task? It depends when you look for it.使用点探测任务时对愤怒面孔的注意偏向?这取决于你何时去寻找它。
Behav Res Ther. 2006 Sep;44(9):1321-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.10.004.

引用本文的文献

1
Inefficient and unique processing of social-emotional interference in school-aged children with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder.高功能自闭症谱系障碍学龄儿童对社会情感干扰的处理效率低下且具有独特性。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 9;15:1412533. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1412533. eCollection 2024.
2
Computational analysis of value learning and value-driven detection of neutral faces by young and older adults.年轻人和老年人对中性面孔的价值学习及价值驱动检测的计算分析。
Front Psychol. 2024 May 23;15:1281857. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1281857. eCollection 2024.
3
Assessing attentional bias to emotions in adolescent offenders and nonoffenders.
评估青少年犯罪者和非犯罪者对情绪的注意偏向。
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 24;14:1192114. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1192114. eCollection 2023.
4
A theory of visibility measures in the dissociation paradigm.分离范式中的可见度度量理论。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Feb;31(1):65-88. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02332-z. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
5
The temporal dynamics of emotion comparison depends on low-level attentional factors.情绪比较的时间动态取决于低水平的注意力因素。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 5;13(1):7324. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33711-0.
6
The Possible Role of Apathy on Conflict Monitoring: Preliminary Findings of a Behavioral Study on Severe Acquired Brain Injury Patients Using Flanker Tasks.冷漠在冲突监测中的可能作用:一项使用侧翼任务对重度后天性脑损伤患者进行的行为研究的初步结果
Brain Sci. 2023 Feb 10;13(2):298. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13020298.
7
The Emotion Regulation Mechanism in Neurotic Individuals: The Potential Role of Mindfulness and Cognitive Bias.神经质个体的情绪调节机制:正念和认知偏差的潜在作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 4;20(2):896. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20020896.
8
Deep-SAGA: a deep-learning-based system for automatic gaze annotation from eye-tracking data.深度 SAGA:一种基于深度学习的眼动追踪数据自动注视点标注系统。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Apr;55(3):1372-1391. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01833-4. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
9
Suppression of alpha-band power underlies exogenous attention to emotional distractors.抑制 alpha 波段的功率是对外源性情绪干扰物注意的基础。
Psychophysiology. 2022 Sep;59(9):e14051. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14051. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
10
Close - but not distant - conditioned flanker emotion affects crowding.近而不远处的条件性侧翼情绪会影响拥挤感。
J Vis. 2021 Aug 2;21(8):22. doi: 10.1167/jov.21.8.22.