Cope Jacqueline R, Yano Elizabeth M, Lee Martin L, Washington Donna L
ValleyCare, Department of Health Services, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Mar;21 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S33-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00372.x.
To describe the variation in provision of hormonal and intrauterine contraception among Veterans Affairs (VA) facilities.
Key informant, cross-sectional survey of 166 VA medical facilities. Data from public use data sets and VA administrative databases were linked to facility data to further characterize their contextual environments.
All VA hospital-based and affiliated community-based outpatient clinics delivering services to at least 400 unique women during fiscal year 2000.
Onsite availability of hormonal contraceptive prescription and intrauterine device (IUD) placement.
Ninety-seven percent of facilities offered onsite prescription and management of hormonal contraception whereas 63% offered placement of IUDs. After adjusting for facility caseload of reproductive-aged women, 3 organizational factors were independently associated with onsite IUD placement: (1) onsite gynecologist (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 20.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.02 to 58.74; P<.001); (2) hospital-based in contrast to community-based practice (adjusted OR, 5.49; 95% CI, 1.16 to 26.10; P=.03); and (3) availability of a clinician providing women's health training to other clinicians (adjusted OR, 3.40; 95% CI 1.19 to 9.76; P=.02).
VA's provision of hormonal and intrauterine contraception is in accordance with community standards, although onsite availability is not universal. Although contraception is a crucial component of a woman's health maintenance, her ability to obtain certain contraceptives from the facility where she obtains her primary care is largely influenced by the availability of a gynecologist. Further research is needed to determine how fragmentation of women's care into reproductive and nonreproductive services impacts access to contraception and the incidence of unintended pregnancy.
描述退伍军人事务部(VA)各医疗机构提供激素避孕和宫内避孕服务的差异。
对166家VA医疗机构进行关键信息提供者横断面调查。将来自公共使用数据集和VA行政数据库的数据与机构数据相链接,以进一步描述其背景环境。
2000财年所有为至少400名不同女性提供服务的VA医院及附属社区门诊。
激素避孕处方的现场可获取性及宫内节育器(IUD)放置服务。
97%的机构提供激素避孕的现场处方和管理,而63%的机构提供IUD放置服务。在对育龄女性的机构病例量进行调整后,3个组织因素与现场IUD放置独立相关:(1)有现场妇科医生(调整后的优势比[OR]为20.35;95%置信区间[CI]为7.02至58.74;P<0.001);(2)与社区医疗机构相比,基于医院的机构(调整后的OR为5.49;95%CI为1.16至26.10;P=0.03);(3)有可为其他临床医生提供女性健康培训的临床医生(调整后的OR为3.40;95%CI为1.19至9.76;P=0.02)。
VA提供激素避孕和宫内避孕服务符合社区标准,尽管现场可获取性并不普遍。尽管避孕是女性健康维护的关键组成部分,但她能否在接受初级保健的机构获得某些避孕措施,很大程度上受妇科医生可获取性的影响。需要进一步研究以确定将女性护理分为生殖和非生殖服务的碎片化情况如何影响避孕措施的获取及意外怀孕的发生率。