• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国饮食协会的立场:食品与营养方面的错误信息。

Position of the American Dietetic Association: food and nutrition misinformation.

作者信息

Wansink Brian

机构信息

Cornell University, Ithica, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Am Diet Assoc. 2006 Apr;106(4):601-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2006.02.019.

DOI:10.1016/j.jada.2006.02.019
PMID:16639825
Abstract

It is the position of the American Dietetic Association (ADA) that food and nutrition misinformation can have harmful effects on the health, well-being, and economic status of consumers. Nationally credentialed dietetics professionals working in health care, academia, public health, the media, government, and the food industry are uniquely qualified to advocate for and promote science-based nutrition information to the public, function as primary nutrition educators to health professionals, and actively correct food and nutrition misinformation. Enormous scientific advances have been made in the area of food and nutrition, leading to a fine-tuning of recommendations about healthful eating. Consumers have become increasingly aware of the nutrition-health link and reliant on nutrition information to base their decisions, and have assumed partial responsibility for changing their eating behaviors. Unfortunately, these same trends also create opportunities for food and nutrition misinformation to flourish. News reports rarely provide enough context for consumers to interpret or apply the advice given, and preliminary findings often attract unmerited and misleading attention. Effective nutrition communication must be consumer-friendly and contain sufficient context to allow consumers to consider the information and determine whether it applies to their unique health and nutritional needs. Consistent with ADA's organizational vision that members "are the leading source of nutrition expertise," ADA recognizes its responsibility to help consumers identify food and nutrition misinformation in the following ways: (a) ADA members should provide consumers with sound, science-based nutrition information and help them to recognize misinformation; (b) ADA members need to be the primary source of sound, science-based nutrition information for the media and to inform them when misinformation is presented; and (c) ADA members should continue to diligently work with other health care practitioners, educators, policy makers, and food and dietary supplement industry representatives to responsibly address the health and psychological, physiological, and economic effects of nutrition-related misinformation.

摘要

美国饮食协会(ADA)的立场是,食品和营养方面的错误信息会对消费者的健康、幸福和经济状况产生有害影响。在医疗保健、学术界、公共卫生、媒体、政府和食品行业工作的具有国家资质的饮食专业人员,具备独特的资格向公众倡导和推广基于科学的营养信息,担任健康专业人员的主要营养教育者,并积极纠正食品和营养方面的错误信息。食品和营养领域已经取得了巨大的科学进步,从而对健康饮食建议进行了微调。消费者越来越意识到营养与健康的联系,并依赖营养信息来做出决策,而且已经承担起部分改变自身饮食行为的责任。不幸的是,这些相同的趋势也为食品和营养错误信息的泛滥创造了机会。新闻报道很少为消费者提供足够的背景信息来解读或应用所给出的建议,而初步研究结果往往会吸引不应有的和误导性的关注。有效的营养沟通必须对消费者友好,并包含足够的背景信息,以便消费者考虑这些信息并确定其是否适用于他们独特的健康和营养需求。与ADA的组织愿景一致,即成员“是营养专业知识的主要来源”,ADA认识到其有责任通过以下方式帮助消费者识别食品和营养错误信息:(a)ADA成员应向消费者提供可靠的、基于科学的营养信息,并帮助他们识别错误信息;(b)ADA成员需要成为媒体获取可靠的、基于科学的营养信息的主要来源,并在出现错误信息时告知媒体;(c)ADA成员应继续与其他医疗保健从业者、教育工作者、政策制定者以及食品和膳食补充剂行业代表勤奋合作,以负责任地应对与营养相关的错误信息对健康、心理、生理和经济的影响。

相似文献

1
Position of the American Dietetic Association: food and nutrition misinformation.美国饮食协会的立场:食品与营养方面的错误信息。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2006 Apr;106(4):601-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2006.02.019.
2
Position of the American Dietetic Association: food and nutrition misinformation.美国饮食协会立场:食品与营养方面的错误信息。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2002 Feb;102(2):260-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8223(02)90062-3.
3
Position of the American Dietetic Association: food and nutrition misinformation.美国饮食协会的立场:食品与营养方面的错误信息。
J Am Diet Assoc. 1995 Jun;95(6):705-7. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(95)00195-6.
4
Position of the American Dietetic Association: nutrition education for the public.美国饮食协会立场声明:面向公众的营养教育
J Am Diet Assoc. 1996 Nov;96(11):1183-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8223(96)00305-7.
5
Paucity of nutrition and food safety 'news you can use' reveals opportunity for dietetics practitioners.营养资讯匮乏以及食品安全“实用新闻”的缺失为营养从业者带来了机遇。
J Am Diet Assoc. 1998 Feb;98(2):190-3. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(98)00047-9.
6
Position of the American Dietetic Association: functional foods.美国饮食协会的立场:功能性食品。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2009 Apr;109(4):735-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2009.02.023.
7
Position of the American Dietetic Association: total diet approach to communicating food and nutrition information.美国营养与饮食学会立场声明:采用整体饮食法传递食物与营养信息。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2007 Jul;107(7):1224-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2007.05.025.
8
Position of the American Dietetic Association: Agricultural and food biotechnology.美国饮食协会的立场:农业与食品生物技术
J Am Diet Assoc. 2006 Feb;106(2):285-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2005.12.017.
9
Position of the American Dietetic Association: Food and water safety.美国饮食协会立场:食品与水安全
J Am Diet Assoc. 2009 Aug;109(8):1449-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2009.06.379.
10
Position of the American Dietetic Association: food irradiation.美国饮食协会的立场:食品辐照
J Am Diet Assoc. 2000 Feb;100(2):246-53. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8223(00)00075-4.

引用本文的文献

1
A Qualitative Study of Rural Plant-Based Eaters' Knowledge and Practices for Nutritional Adequacy.农村植物性饮食者营养充足知识与实践的定性研究。
Nutrients. 2024 Oct 16;16(20):3504. doi: 10.3390/nu16203504.
2
Mediterranean Diet Information on TikTok and Implications for Digital Health Promotion Research: Social Media Content Analysis.TikTok上的地中海饮食信息及其对数字健康促进研究的启示:社交媒体内容分析
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jun 19;8:e51094. doi: 10.2196/51094.
3
Are popular books about diet and health written based on scientific evidence? A comparison of citations between the USA and Japan.
关于饮食和健康的大众书籍是基于科学证据编写的吗?对美国和日本的引文的比较。
Public Health Nutr. 2023 Dec;26(12):2815-2825. doi: 10.1017/S1368980023002549. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
4
Quality and accuracy of online nutrition-related information: a systematic review of content analysis studies.在线营养相关信息的质量和准确性:内容分析研究的系统评价。
Public Health Nutr. 2023 Jul;26(7):1345-1357. doi: 10.1017/S1368980023000873. Epub 2023 May 4.
5
Evidence-Based Lifestyle Guidelines and Self-Management Strategies Utilized by Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.多囊卵巢综合征女性采用的循证生活方式指南和自我管理策略。
Nutrients. 2023 Jan 22;15(3):589. doi: 10.3390/nu15030589.
6
Validation of a sports nutrition knowledge questionnaire for athletes in the United Kingdom and Ireland.英国和爱尔兰运动员运动营养知识问卷的验证。
J Nutr Sci. 2023 Jan 6;12:e2. doi: 10.1017/jns.2022.109. eCollection 2023.
7
Anti-Inflammatory Diets in Fertility: An Evidence Review.抗炎饮食与生育力:证据综述。
Nutrients. 2022 Sep 21;14(19):3914. doi: 10.3390/nu14193914.
8
#Healthpromotion: A qualitative exploration of how dietitians can use social media to positively influence women aged 18-35 years.健康促进:营养师如何利用社交媒体积极影响 18-35 岁女性的定性探索。
Nutr Diet. 2022 Sep;79(4):489-496. doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.12765.
9
The health implications of distrust in the food system: findings from the dimensions of trust in food systems scale (DOTIFS scale).食品体系不信任的健康影响:食品体系信任维度量表(DOTIFS 量表)的研究结果。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jul 28;21(1):1468. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11349-9.
10
An Audit of the Nutrition and Health Claims on Breakfast Cereals in Supermarkets in the Illawarra Region of Australia.对澳大利亚伊拉瓦拉地区超市早餐麦片的营养和健康声称进行审计。
Nutrients. 2019 Jul 15;11(7):1604. doi: 10.3390/nu11071604.