Suppr超能文献

脉冲直流磁技术在无框架立体定向术中跟踪术中头部运动的临床应用研究。

Study on the clinical application of pulsed DC magnetic technology for tracking of intraoperative head motion during frameless stereotaxy.

作者信息

Suess Olaf, Suess Silke, Mularski Sven, Kühn Björn, Picht Thomas, Hammersen Stefanie, Stendel Rüdiger, Brock Mario, Kombos Theodoros

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Charité - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Head Face Med. 2006 Apr 26;2:10. doi: 10.1186/1746-160X-2-10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tracking of post-registration head motion is one of the major problems in frameless stereotaxy. Various attempts in detecting and compensating for this phenomenon rely on a fixed reference device rigidly attached to the patient's head. However, most of such reference tools are either based on an invasive fixation technique or have physical limitations which allow mobility of the head only in a restricted range of motion after completion of the registration procedure.

METHODS

A new sensor-based reference tool, the so-called Dynamic Reference Frame (DRF) which is designed to allow an unrestricted, 360 degrees range of motion for the intraoperative use in pulsed DC magnetic navigation was tested in 40 patients. Different methods of non-invasive attachment dependent on the clinical need and type of procedure, as well as the resulting accuracies in the clinical application have been analyzed.

RESULTS

Apart from conventional, completely rigid immobilization of the head (type A), four additional modes of head fixation and attachment of the DRF were distinguished on clinical grounds: type B1 = pin fixation plus oral DRF attachment; type B2 = pin fixation plus retroauricular DRF attachment; type C1 = free head positioning with oral DRF; and type C2 = free head positioning with retroauricular DRF. Mean fiducial registration errors (FRE) were as follows: type A interventions = 1.51 mm, B1 = 1.56 mm, B2 = 1.54 mm, C1 = 1.73 mm, and C2 = 1.75 mm. The mean position errors determined at the end of the intervention as a measure of application accuracy were: 1.45 mm in type A interventions, 1.26 mm in type B1, 1.44 mm in type B2, 1.86 mm in type C1, and 1.68 mm in type C2.

CONCLUSION

Rigid head immobilization guarantees most reliable accuracy in various types of frameless stereotaxy. The use of an additional DRF, however, increases the application scope of frameless stereotaxy to include e.g. procedures in which rigid pin fixation of the cranium is not required or desired. Thus, continuous tracking of head motion allows highly flexible variation of the surgical strategy including intraoperative repositioning of the patient without impairment of navigational accuracy as it ensures automatic correction of spatial distortion. With a dental cast for oral attachment and the alternative option of non-invasive retroauricular attachment, flexibility in the clinical use of the DRF is ensured.

摘要

背景

注册后头部运动追踪是无框架立体定向技术的主要问题之一。检测和补偿这种现象的各种尝试都依赖于牢固附着在患者头部的固定参考装置。然而,大多数此类参考工具要么基于侵入性固定技术,要么存在物理限制,使得在注册程序完成后头部只能在有限的运动范围内活动。

方法

一种新的基于传感器的参考工具,即所谓的动态参考框架(DRF),其设计目的是允许在脉冲直流磁导航术中进行无限制的360度运动,在40例患者中进行了测试。分析了根据临床需求和手术类型的不同非侵入性附着方法,以及临床应用中的最终精度。

结果

除了传统的完全刚性固定头部(A型)外,根据临床情况还区分了另外四种头部固定和DRF附着模式:B1型=销钉固定加口腔DRF附着;B2型=销钉固定加耳后DRF附着;C1型=自由头部定位加口腔DRF;C2型=自由头部定位加耳后DRF。平均基准注册误差(FRE)如下:A型干预=1.51毫米,B1型=1.56毫米,B2型=1.54毫米,C1型=1.73毫米,C2型=1.75毫米。干预结束时确定的平均位置误差作为应用精度的衡量标准为:A型干预为1.45毫米,B1型为1.26毫米,B2型为1.44毫米,C1型为1.86毫米,C2型为1.68毫米。

结论

刚性头部固定在各种类型的无框架立体定向中保证了最可靠的精度。然而,使用额外的DRF增加了无框架立体定向的应用范围,例如包括不需要或不希望对颅骨进行刚性销钉固定的手术。因此,连续追踪头部运动允许高度灵活地改变手术策略,包括术中重新定位患者,而不会损害导航精度,因为它确保了空间畸变的自动校正。通过用于口腔附着的牙模和非侵入性耳后附着的替代选项,确保了DRF在临床使用中的灵活性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4f3/1459123/3921965fdbf0/1746-160X-2-10-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验