• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

四排螺旋计算机断层扫描与冠状动脉造影在评估冠状动脉支架方面的比较。

Comparison between four-slice computed tomography and coronary angiography for the assessment of coronary stents.

作者信息

Mazzarotto Pietro, Di Renzi Paolo, Paluello Giovanni Minio, Carunchio Alessandro, Ricci Roberto, Molisso Antonio, Ceci Vincenzo, Indolfi Ciro

机构信息

U O Cardiologia invasiva e interventistica endovascolare, Ospedale S Carlo-I D I, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2006 May;7(5):328-34. doi: 10.2459/01.JCM.0000223254.24309.b3.

DOI:10.2459/01.JCM.0000223254.24309.b3
PMID:16645410
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The present study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of four-slice computed tomography for the detection, localization and patency assessment of metal coronary stents in a general population referred for coronary angiography late after coronary angioplasty.

METHODS

Twenty-four consecutive patients with 34 coronary stents underwent multislice computed tomography within 24 h before a clinically driven coronary angiography performed 245 +/- 92 days after coronary stent implantation. For each patient, two independent operators were asked to evaluate the overall number of stents, the treated coronary vessels and segments, the presence of side-branches in the stented segment, the vessel patency, and the presence of binary in-stent restenosis.

RESULTS

Four-slice computed tomography was feasible in 23 out of 24 patients (96%). Diagnostic accuracy was 94% for stent detection, 96% for the recognition of the stented coronary vessel and 97% for the identification of the stented segment. Accuracy in detection of side-branches in the stented segment, vessel patency and in-stent restenosis was 86%, 88% and 50%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Four-slice computed tomography is accurate in the identification of the stented coronary vessel and segment. By contrast, accuracy is low in the detection of vessel patency and in-stent restenosis. Such a technique does not appear to be useful as a screening tool before invasive diagnostic procedures.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估四层计算机断层扫描对接受冠状动脉成形术较晚后因冠状动脉造影转诊的普通人群中金属冠状动脉支架的检测、定位及通畅性评估的诊断准确性。

方法

24例连续患者共34个冠状动脉支架在冠状动脉支架植入术后245±92天进行临床驱动的冠状动脉造影前24小时内接受多层计算机断层扫描。对于每位患者,两名独立操作人员被要求评估支架总数、接受治疗的冠状动脉血管和节段、支架节段内分支的存在情况、血管通畅性以及支架内二元再狭窄的存在情况。

结果

24例患者中有23例(96%)可行四层计算机断层扫描。支架检测的诊断准确性为94%,识别支架置入的冠状动脉血管的准确性为96%,识别支架置入节段的准确性为97%。支架节段内分支检测、血管通畅性及支架内再狭窄的准确性分别为86%、88%和50%。

结论

四层计算机断层扫描在识别支架置入的冠状动脉血管和节段方面准确。相比之下,血管通畅性及支架内再狭窄检测的准确性较低。这种技术似乎不作为侵入性诊断程序前的筛查工具。

相似文献

1
Comparison between four-slice computed tomography and coronary angiography for the assessment of coronary stents.四排螺旋计算机断层扫描与冠状动脉造影在评估冠状动脉支架方面的比较。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2006 May;7(5):328-34. doi: 10.2459/01.JCM.0000223254.24309.b3.
2
Feasibility of assessment of coronary stent patency using 16-slice computed tomography.使用16层计算机断层扫描评估冠状动脉支架通畅性的可行性。
Am J Cardiol. 2004 Aug 15;94(4):427-30. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.04.057.
3
Assessment of coronary artery stent patency and restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography.使用64层计算机断层扫描评估冠状动脉支架通畅性和再狭窄。
Acad Radiol. 2006 Dec;13(12):1465-73. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2006.09.044.
4
Comparison of feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography versus invasive coronary angiography versus intravascular ultrasound for evaluation of in-stent restenosis.64层螺旋计算机断层扫描冠状动脉造影术、有创冠状动脉造影术及血管内超声评估支架内再狭窄的可行性及诊断准确性比较
Am J Cardiol. 2009 May 15;103(10):1349-58. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.01.343. Epub 2009 Mar 25.
5
Noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery stents patency after PTCA: role of Multislice Computed Tomography.经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术(PTCA)后冠状动脉支架通畅性的无创评估:多层螺旋计算机断层扫描的作用
Radiol Med. 2004 Jul-Aug;108(1-2):128-37.
6
Noninvasive assessment of coronary stents in patients by 16-slice computed tomography.16层计算机断层扫描对患者冠状动脉支架的无创评估
Int J Cardiol. 2006 May 10;109(2):188-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.06.012. Epub 2005 Jul 14.
7
Coronary artery visualization using a 64-row multi-slice computed tomography in unselected patients with definite or suspected coronary artery disease: a comparison with invasive coronary angiography.在未经过筛选的确诊或疑似冠心病患者中使用64排多层计算机断层扫描进行冠状动脉可视化:与有创冠状动脉造影的比较。
Cardiol J. 2009;16(5):413-7.
8
Non-invasive assessment of coronary Palmaz-Schatz stents by contrast enhanced electron beam computed tomography.通过对比增强电子束计算机断层扫描对冠状动脉Palmaz-Schatz支架进行无创评估。
Eur Heart J. 1996 Oct;17(10):1546-53. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a014719.
9
Evaluation of coronary artery in-stent patency using 64-slice computed tomography.使用64层计算机断层扫描评估冠状动脉支架内通畅情况。
Coron Artery Dis. 2011 Dec;22(8):540-52. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e32834c1a28.
10
Usefulness of measuring coronary lumen density with multi-slice computed tomography to detect in-stent restenosis.多层计算机断层扫描测量冠状动脉管腔密度在检测支架内再狭窄中的应用价值。
Int J Cardiol. 2008 Feb 29;124(2):239-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.11.231. Epub 2007 Mar 23.

引用本文的文献

1
CT Imaging of Coronary Stents: Past, Present, and Future.冠状动脉支架的CT成像:过去、现在与未来
ISRN Cardiol. 2012;2012:139823. doi: 10.5402/2012/139823. Epub 2012 Sep 11.