Barrett Geraldine, Cassell Jackie A, Peacock Janet L, Coleman Michel P
School of Health Sciences and Social Care, Brunel University, Middlesex TW7 5DU.
BMJ. 2006 May 6;332(7549):1068-72. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38805.473738.7C. Epub 2006 Apr 28.
To describe the views of the British public on the use of personal medical data by the National Cancer Registry without individual consent, and to assess the relative importance attached by the public to personal privacy in relation to public health uses of identifiable health data.
Cross sectional, face to face interview survey.
England, Wales, and Scotland.
2872 respondents, 97% of those who took part in the Office for National Statistics' omnibus survey, a national multistage probability sample, in March and April 2005 (response rates 62% and 69%, respectively).
72% (95% confidence interval 70% to 74%) of all respondents did not consider any of the following to be an invasion of their privacy by the National Cancer Registry: inclusion of postcode, inclusion of name and address, and the receipt of a letter inviting them to a research study on the basis of inclusion in the registry. Only 2% (2% to 3%) of the sample considered all of these to amount to an invasion of privacy. Logistic regression analysis showed that the proportions not concerned about invasion of privacy varied significantly by country, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and housing tenure, although in all subgroups examined most respondents had no concerns. 81% (79% to 83%) of all respondents said that they would support a law making cancer registration statutory.
Most of the British public considers the confidential use of personal, identifiable patient information by the National Cancer Registry for the purposes of public health research and surveillance not to be an invasion of privacy.
描述英国公众对国家癌症登记处未经个人同意使用个人医疗数据的看法,并评估公众在可识别健康数据用于公共卫生方面对个人隐私的相对重视程度。
横断面面对面访谈调查。
英格兰、威尔士和苏格兰。
2872名受访者,占2005年3月和4月参加英国国家统计局综合调查(全国多阶段概率抽样)者的97%(回复率分别为62%和69%)。
所有受访者中,72%(95%置信区间70%至74%)认为国家癌症登记处的以下任何行为都不侵犯其隐私:纳入邮政编码、纳入姓名和地址,以及基于登记处记录收到邀请参加研究的信件。样本中只有2%(2%至3%)认为所有这些都构成隐私侵犯。逻辑回归分析表明,不担心隐私侵犯的比例因国家、种族、社会经济地位和住房保有情况而有显著差异,尽管在所有调查的亚组中,大多数受访者都不担心。81%(79%至83%)的受访者表示他们会支持一项使癌症登记成为法定要求的法律。
大多数英国公众认为国家癌症登记处为公共卫生研究和监测目的而对个人可识别患者信息进行保密使用并非侵犯隐私。