• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Ethics of Informed Consent for Data Registries: Moving Beyond Moral Minimalism to the High Ground.数据登记处知情同意的伦理:从道德最低限度主义迈向更高标准。
Bioethics. 2025 Sep;39(7):709-715. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13438. Epub 2025 Jun 11.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Strengthening ethical oversight in genomics and biobanking: a retrospective analysis of research practices in Zimbabwe.加强基因组学和生物样本库中的伦理监督:津巴布韦研究实践的回顾性分析
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Jul 9;26(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01257-7.
4
Inadequacy of ethical conduct and reporting of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials: Results from a systematic review.阶梯楔形整群随机试验的伦理行为及报告存在不足:一项系统评价的结果
Clin Trials. 2017 Aug;14(4):333-341. doi: 10.1177/1740774517703057. Epub 2017 Apr 8.
5
Waiver of informed consent in pediatric resuscitation research: a systematic review.免除知情同意在儿科复苏研究中的应用:系统评价。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Aug;20(8):822-34. doi: 10.1111/acem.12180.
6
MarkVCID cerebral small vessel consortium: I. Enrollment, clinical, fluid protocols.马克 VCID 脑小血管联盟:一、入组、临床、液体方案。
Alzheimers Dement. 2021 Apr;17(4):704-715. doi: 10.1002/alz.12215. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
7
From black box to clarity: Strategies for effective AI informed consent in healthcare.从黑箱到明晰:医疗保健中有效人工智能知情同意的策略。
Artif Intell Med. 2025 May 24;167:103169. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2025.103169.
8
Interventions to promote informed consent for patients undergoing surgical and other invasive healthcare procedures.促进接受外科手术及其他侵入性医疗程序的患者实现知情同意的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 6;2013(7):CD009445. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009445.pub2.
9
When is it impractical to ask informed consent? A systematic review.在什么情况下征求知情同意不切实际?系统评价。
Clin Trials. 2022 Oct;19(5):545-560. doi: 10.1177/17407745221103567. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
10
Developing evidence-based guidelines for describing potential benefits and harms within patient information leaflets/sheets (PILs) that inform and do not cause harm (PrinciPILs).制定基于证据的指南,用于在患者信息单页/说明书(PrinciPILs)中描述潜在益处和危害,这些信息单页既能提供信息又不会造成伤害。
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Aug;29(43):1-20. doi: 10.3310/GJJH2402.

本文引用的文献

1
Nordic Citizens' Willingness to Share Digital Health Data.北欧民众对分享数字健康数据的意愿。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2024 Aug 22;316:120-124. doi: 10.3233/SHTI240359.
2
What does the French REIN registry tell us about Stage 4-5 CKD care in older adults?法国肾脏登记处能告诉我们关于老年患者4 - 5期慢性肾脏病护理的哪些信息?
Front Nephrol. 2023 Jan 17;2:1026874. doi: 10.3389/fneph.2022.1026874. eCollection 2022.
3
Duties of Candour in Healthcare: The Truth, the Whole Truth, and Nothing but the Truth?医疗保健中的坦诚义务:真话、全部真话、还是只有真话?
Med Law Rev. 2022 May 30;30(2):324-347. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwac004.
4
The effectiveness of nudging: A meta-analysis of choice architecture interventions across behavioral domains.推动的有效性:行为领域的选择架构干预措施的荟萃分析。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jan 4;119(1). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2107346118.
5
National and international kidney failure registries: characteristics, commonalities, and contrasts.国家和国际肾衰竭登记处:特点、共性和对比。
Kidney Int. 2022 Jan;101(1):23-35. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.09.024. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
6
Is waiver of consent for the use of health information for research acceptable to emergency department patients?患者是否同意放弃使用健康信息进行研究?
Emerg Med Australas. 2021 Apr;33(2):379-384. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13728. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
7
Presumed Consent With Opt-Out: An Ethical Consent Approach to Automatically Refer Patients With Cancer to Tobacco Treatment Services.推定同意并选择退出:一种将癌症患者自动转诊至烟草治疗服务的伦理同意方法。
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Mar 10;39(8):876-880. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.03180. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
8
In Defence of informed consent for health record research - why arguments from 'easy rescue', 'no harm' and 'consent bias' fail.为健康记录研究中的知情同意辩护——为何“轻松救援”“无伤害”及“同意偏差”的论点站不住脚。
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Aug 20;21(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00519-w.
9
: Marking Its Fortieth Anniversary.纪念其四十周年。
Am J Bioeth. 2019 Nov;19(11):9-12. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1665402.
10
Erroneous data and drug industry bias can impair machine learning algorithms.错误数据和制药行业的偏见会损害机器学习算法。
BMJ. 2019 Oct 18;367:l6042. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6042.

数据登记处知情同意的伦理:从道德最低限度主义迈向更高标准。

The Ethics of Informed Consent for Data Registries: Moving Beyond Moral Minimalism to the High Ground.

作者信息

Chingarande George Rugare

机构信息

Division of Medical Ethics and Law, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa.

出版信息

Bioethics. 2025 Sep;39(7):709-715. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13438. Epub 2025 Jun 11.

DOI:10.1111/bioe.13438
PMID:40501000
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12392241/
Abstract

There is a rapid increase in disease registries all over the world, propelled by innovations in electronic health records and computer technologies. Unlike the developed world, where many registries are well established, many disease registries in the developing world are still in their incipient stage. Establishment of disease registries is blighted by many ethical concerns. These include but are not limited to data capture and data transfer happening without explicit patient consent; data sharing with third parties for various purposes including research, policy making and advocacy; and retrospective consent waiver. This is compounded by the lack of ethical guidelines and international best practices. This paper presents an ethical analysis of the ethics of informed consent for data registries.

摘要

在电子健康记录和计算机技术创新的推动下,全球疾病登记数量迅速增加。与许多登记制度已成熟的发达国家不同,发展中国家的许多疾病登记仍处于初始阶段。疾病登记制度的建立受到诸多伦理问题的困扰。这些问题包括但不限于在未获得患者明确同意的情况下进行数据采集和数据传输;出于研究、政策制定和宣传等各种目的与第三方共享数据;以及追溯性放弃同意。缺乏伦理准则和国际最佳实践使情况更加复杂。本文对数据登记知情同意的伦理进行了分析。