Suppr超能文献

慢性下背痛患者的安全抬举:FCE抬举任务与美国国家职业安全与健康研究所(NIOSH)抬举指南的比较

Safe lifting in patients with chronic low back pain: comparing FCE lifting task and Niosh lifting guideline.

作者信息

Kuijer Wietske, Dijkstra Pieter U, Brouwer Sandra, Reneman Michiel F, Groothoff Johan W, Geertzen Jan H B

机构信息

Center for Rehabilitation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Occup Rehabil. 2006 Dec;16(4):579-89. doi: 10.1007/s10926-005-9010-3.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Both the floor-to-waist lifting task of the Isernhagen Work Systems Functional Capacity Evaluation (IWS FCE) and recommended weight limit (RWL) of the NIOSH produce safe lifting weights and are used world-wide nowadays. It is unknown whether they produce similar safe lifting weights. Aim of this study was to compare FCE performance on the floor-to-waist lifting task and RWL of the NIOSH lifting guideline for this task, in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP).

METHODS

Ninety-two patients performed the FCE lifting task. RWL was calculated for this task. Performance was compared with RWL. A lifting index was calculated by dividing performance by RWL. Differences between groups with a lifting index < or =1, 1-3, and >3 were calculated for pain intensity, scores on the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) and work status.

RESULTS

Men lifted on average 32.5 kg (SD 15.4) and women 18.8 kg (SD 7.8). RWL for this task was 12.8 kg. Mean difference between performance and RWL was 15.0 kg (SD 14.7; range -8.8 to 59.2). The Roland Morris Disability score of patients with a lifting index < or =1 was significantly lower than patients with a lifting index 1-3 and >3. No difference in pain intensity and work status was found between groups.

CONCLUSION

It was concluded that performance on the FCE floor-to-waist lifting task and RWL of the NIOSH for this task produce different safe lifting weights in individual patients with CLBP, which may result in contradictory recommendations about need for rehabilitation and return to work.

摘要

引言

伊瑟恩哈根工作系统功能能力评估(IWS FCE)中的从地面到腰部的提举任务以及美国国家职业安全与健康研究所(NIOSH)的推荐重量限制(RWL)都能得出安全的提举重量,且目前在全球范围内都有应用。尚不清楚它们得出的安全提举重量是否相似。本研究的目的是比较慢性下腰痛(CLBP)患者在从地面到腰部提举任务中的FCE表现与NIOSH提举指南中该任务的RWL。

方法

92名患者进行了FCE提举任务。计算了该任务的RWL。将表现与RWL进行比较。通过将表现除以RWL来计算提举指数。计算提举指数≤1、1 - 3和>3的组在疼痛强度、罗兰·莫里斯残疾问卷(RMDQ)得分和工作状态方面的差异。

结果

男性平均提举32.5千克(标准差15.4),女性平均提举18.8千克(标准差7.8)。该任务的RWL为12.8千克。表现与RWL之间的平均差异为15.0千克(标准差14.7;范围 - 8.8至59.2)。提举指数≤1的患者的罗兰·莫里斯残疾评分显著低于提举指数为1 - 3和>3的患者。各组之间在疼痛强度和工作状态方面未发现差异。

结论

得出的结论是,在CLBP个体患者中,FCE从地面到腰部提举任务的表现与NIOSH该任务的RWL产生了不同的安全提举重量,这可能导致关于康复需求和重返工作的建议相互矛盾。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验